Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Vijayalakshmi vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 17147 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17147 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022

Madras High Court
T.Vijayalakshmi vs The Secretary To Government on 2 November, 2022
                                                                     W.P.No.1332 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 02.11.2022

                                                       CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                               W.P.No.1332 of 2019

                    T.Vijayalakshmi                                      ...Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                    1.The Secretary to Government,
                      School Education Department,
                      Fort St. George,
                      Chennai – 600 009.

                    2.The Director of School Education,
                      College Road,
                      Chennai – 600 006.

                    3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                      Salem – 636 001.

                    4.The District Educational Officer,
                      Salem – 636 001.

                    5.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
                      Chennai – 600 018.

                    6.The Treasury Accounts Officer,
                      Salem District, Salem.


                                                          1/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.P.No.1332 of 2019



                    7.Indira

                    8.Uma

                    9.Jaya

                    10.Gita                                                           Respondents

                    Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
                    issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to pay to the
                    petitioner the family pension payable to her mother Chellammal, as the
                    widow of K.Thandavan till the death of Chellammal as well as 1/ 5th share of
                    Chellammal in the other benefits like Provident Fund, Gratuity and like
                    benefits as directed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem by
                    Judgement dated 02.01.2004 in O.S.No.132/ 2002, together with interest at
                    18% per annum from 02.01.2004.

                                  For Petitioner          : Mr.Leela Raman
                                                            for M/s.T.M.Hariharan


                                  For Respondents         : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru
                                                            Special Government Pleader
                                                            for R1 to R4 and R6

                                                            Mr.V.Murali for R5

                                                            Mr.R.Rajarajan for R7 to R10


                                                          2/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    W.P.No.1332 of 2019



                                                         ORDER

The writ of mandamus is instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to

pay to the petitioner the family pension payable to her mother Chellammal, as

the widow of K.Thandavan till the death of Chellammal as well as 1/5th

share of Chellammal in the other benefits like Provident Fund, Gratuity and

like benefits as directed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem by

judgment dated 02.01.2004 in O.S.No.132/2002, together with interest at 18

percent per annum from 02.01.2004.

2.The petitioner states that she is a daughter born out of the wedlock

between the deceased employee Thandavan and Smt.Chellammal. The

deceased employee Thandavan married Smt.Rajeswari as second wife and

after the death of the employee of the Thandavan, the dispute arouse within

the family and mother of the petitioner Smt.Chellammal along with the

petitioner instituted a Civil Suit in O.S.No.131 of 2002 for declaration and

permanent injunction.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1332 of 2019

3.The Suit decreed in favour of the 1st plaintiff who is the mother of the

petitioner. However, there is no Decree in favour of the 2nd plaintiff who is

the writ petitioner before this Court. The plaintiff could not be able to submit

any document before the competent Civil Court establishing that she is the

daughter born from and out of the wedlock between the deceased employee

Thandavan and Smt.Chellammal. Thus, the Civil Court has not passed any

Decree in favour of the 2nd plaintiff who is the writ petitioner before this

Court and the Decree was passed in favour of the mother of the writ

petitioner, as she was the first wife of the deceased employee Thandavan.

The mother of the writ petitioner Smt.Chellammal also died. Thus, the

petitioner filed the present writ petition stating that the arrears of family

pension and 1/5th share of the other benefits are to be settled in favour of the

writ petitioner.

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the

Department objected the said contention by stating that even as per the Civil

Court Decree, petitioner is not entitled for the benefit. The Civil Court has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1332 of 2019

categorically ordered that the petitioner cannot be considered as a legal heir

of the deceased employee Thandavan and therefore, the arrears of family

pension or 1/5th share of the other benefits cannot be settled in favour of the

writ petitioner. Contrarily, the second wife and her children established that

they are the legal heirs of the deceased employee. Thus, the claims set out in

the present writ petition deserve no merits consideration.

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that disputed facts cannot be

adjudicated in a writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India. The power of judicial review under Article 226 is to ensure the process

through which a decision is taken by the competent authorities in consonance

with the statutes and rules, but not the decision itself. Therefore, the legal

status of a person is to be established before the competent Civil Court of law

by submitting documents and evidence in original which all are to be

adjudicated by way of trial natured proceedings. In the present case, the

petitioner along with her mother filed a Civil Suit and the Civil Court granted

Decree in favour of the mother of the writ petitioner. However, the status of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1332 of 2019

the writ petitioner as a daughter of the deceased employee was not

established before the Civil Court. It is not in dispute regarding the maternity,

but the dispute prevails regarding paternity. Thus, the said dispute is to be

resolved by approaching the competent Court of law and this Court cannot

adjudicate such disputed issues in the present writ petition.

6.In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled

for the relief as such sought for and consequently, the writ petition stands

dismissed. No Costs.



                                                                                           02.11.2022

                    Index    : Yes
                    Internet : Yes
                    Speaking order : Yes
                    ssr

                    To

                    1.The Secretary to Government,
                      School Education Department,
                      Fort St. George,
                      Chennai – 600 009.






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                W.P.No.1332 of 2019

                    2.The Director of School Education,
                      College Road,
                      Chennai – 600 006.

                    3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                      Salem – 636 001.

                    4.The District Educational Officer,
                      Salem – 636 001.

                    5.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu,
                      Chennai – 600 018.

                    6.The Treasury Accounts Officer,
                      Salem District, Salem.








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                W.P.No.1332 of 2019

                                        S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

                                                               ssr




                                           W.P.No.1332 of 2019




                                                     02.11.2022







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter