Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17123 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2022
CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 01.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
and
CMP(MD)No.4923 of 2022
Saveriya Pitchai ... Petitioner
Vs
Fathima ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 115
of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and
final order dated 02.07.2018 made in I.A.No.54 of 2018 in
A.S.No.13 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge,
Vallioor by allowing this civil revision petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhoshkumar
ORDER
This civil revision petition is filed as against the
fair and decreetal order dated 02.07.2019 made in
I.A.No.54 of 2018 in A.S.No.13 of 2010 by the learned
Sub Judge, Valliyoor.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
2.The petitioner has filed the suit in
OS.No.118 of 2005 for the relief of declaration and for
permanent injunction. The suit was dismissed by judgment
and decree dated 14.12.2009 by Additional District Munsif,
Valliyoor. As against the said judgment and decree,
the petitioner filed an appeal before the Sub Court,
Valliyoor in A.S.No.13 of 2020 and the same was dismissed
on 06.11.2012 for default. The petitioner has filed an
interlocutory application in I.A.No.54 of 2018 to set aside
the dismissal order dated 06.11.2012, with a delay of 1716
days. Being not satisfied with the reasons assigned by the
petitioner for the said delay, the appellate Court
dismissed the application. Aggrieved over the same the
present civil revision petition is filed.
3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
by holding that no evidence was produced to prove that the
petitioner was ill and no material was produced to prove
the residence address the appellate Court dismissed the
said application. The appellate Court has not considered
the explanation and the reasons given by the petitioner for
the delay of 1716 days in filing the application to set
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
aside the dismissal order. Further, the delay should be
taken in a lenient manner to meet the ends of justice.
4.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and
perused the materials.
5.The petitioner has suffered a decree in
O.S.No.118 of 2005 dated 14.12.2009 and he has also filed
an appeal in A.S.No.13 of 2010 before the
Sub Court, Valliyoor, but has failed to prosecute it and
therefore, the appeal was dismissed for default on
06.11.2012. However, the application to set aside the
dismissal order was filed with a delay of 1716 days on
17.11.2017 on the ground that he was suffering with illness
and he also resided in his relatives house and therefore,
he could not contact his counsel. However, to substantiate
his claim, the petitioner has not produced any material
that he was ill and he moved to his relatives house. In the
absence of any material, this Court is not inclined to
entertain this petition and there is no reason to interfere
with the order challenged herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
6.In the result, this civil revision petition is
dismissed. No costs.
01.11.2022
dsk
To
The Sub Judge, Valliyoor.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
CRP(MD)No.1825 of 2022
01.11.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!