Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6444 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022
W.A.No.749 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.749 of 2022
M/s.V.K.N.Guest House,
rep. by Proprietor M.Basheer Ahmed,
Old No.43 & 44, New No.89,
Big Street, Triplicane,
Chennai - 600 005. .. Appellant
Vs
1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
No.800, Anna Salai,
Chennai - 600 002.
2.The Assistant Executive Engineer,
O&M, CEDC/Central,
No.800, Anna Salai,
Chennai - 600 002. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
against the order dated 29.11.2021 in W.P.No.28457 of 2011.
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.749 of 2022
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Arun
For the Respondents : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh
Standing Counsel
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
By this writ appeal, a challenge is made to the judgment dated
29.11.2021, whereby the writ petition to challenge the demand of
amount after the final assessment order was dismissed.
2. It is a case where after the provisional assessment under
Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the final assessment order
was passed computing the total amount payable as Rs.7,92,433/-.
Against the said order of final assessment, the appellant has a
remedy of appeal under Section 127 of the Act of 2003, but without
availing it, the writ petition was filed and, that too, on factual
grounds.
3. In the instant case after serving the provisional assessment
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.749 of 2022
order affording an opportunity to the appellant to give a reply to it,
the final assessment order was passed on 16.11.2011. The
provisional assessment order, followed by the final assessment
order, was passed after taking into consideration the allegation of
theft of electricity by the appellant. If the aforesaid fact was
disputed by the appellant, it remains a factual issue and if it was not
disputed, the appellant is liable to pay the amount as demanded
under the final assessment order. The court should not take liberal
approach in these matters, otherwise what we would be doing is
nothing but encouraging theft of electricity, which otherwise exists
and remains unnoticed at times.
4. We do not find any error in the judgment passed by the
learned Single Judge. The court exercising jurisdiction under Article
226 of the Constitution of India cannot arrive at a factual finding as
to what amount should be fixed towards quantum, that too, when
the allegation pertains to theft of electricity, and should strictly
adhere to the process of law.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.749 of 2022
Accordingly, finding no error in the judgment, the appeal is
dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently,
C.M.P.Nos.5225 and 5226 of 2022 are closed.
(M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C., J.)
29.03.2022
Index : Yes/No
sasi
To
1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
No.800, Anna Salai,
Chennai - 600 002.
2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, O&M, CEDC/Central, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.749 of 2022
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.749 of 2022
29.03.2022
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!