Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Jeevanandham vs The District Revenue Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 6430 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6430 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022

Madras High Court
P.Jeevanandham vs The District Revenue Officer on 29 March, 2022
                                                                                W.P.No.7992 of 2020

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 29.03.2022

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

                                               W.P.No.7992 of 2020

                  P.Jeevanandham                                           ..     Petitioner

                                                         vs.
                  1.The District Revenue Officer,
                    Tiruppur.

                  2.The District Collector,
                    Tiruppur.                                              ..     Respondent

                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                  praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to
                  consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2017,
                  within the time, stipulated by this Court on merits and as per law.

                            For Petitioner          : Mr.K.V.Sridharan

                            For Respondent          : Mr.M.Bindran
                                                      Additional Government Pleader

                                                     ORDER

The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Mandamus directing the

respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation

dated 22.05.2017, within the time stipulated by this Court on merits and as

per law.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.7992 of 2020

2. The petitioner, who was working as Assistant in Tiruppur Taluk

Office, was arrested on 01.06.1999 by the Vigilance and Anti Corruption

Coimbatore Wing for accepting a sum of Rs.6,000/- as bribe for issuance of

Solvency Certificate from Thiru. N.Subramaniam. A criminal case was filed

against the petitioner under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of the Prevention

of Corruption Act, 1988 and he was placed under suspension, vide order

dated 02.06.1999. The petitioner was convicted by the Criminal Court and

based on the conviction, he was dismissed from service from 11.09.2003.

Aggrieved against the judgment of conviction, the petitioner preferred an

appeal before this Court in C.A.No.1495 of 2003 and the vide judgment

dated 22.03.2011, the conviction and sentence was set aside. Based on the

judgment of acquittal, the petitioner has requested the respondents to

regularize his period of suspension and dismissal period [01.06.1999 to

10.09.2003 & 11.09.2003 to 22.11.2016] as duty period by submitting a

representation dated 22.05.2017 and since the petitioner's representation is

kept pending without passing any orders, the petitioner has filed the present

writ petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.7992 of 2020

3. The first respondent has filed a Status Report stating that a proposal

was submitted to the Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue

Administration for regularization of the petitioner's absence period to treat as

duty period under Rule 54(B) of the Fundamental Rules and however, the

individual was allowed to retire from service on 28.02.2017 on attaining

superannuation. Regarding payment of benefits to the petitioner, the Revenue

Secretary to Government has to pass an order by regularizing the absence

period [01.06.1999 to 10.09.2003 and 11.09.2003 to 22.11.2016] as duty

period by directing the Collector, Tiruppur to pay the benefits eligible to the

petitioner. It is further stated in the Status Report that regularizing the

period of suspension and dismissal of the petitioner, the Government has to

pass orders and it is awaited.

4. It is to be noted that the petitioner has not arrayed the Secretary to

Government, Revenue Department as party in this writ petition.

5. Recording the aforesaid stand taken by the first respondent in the

Status Report, this Court directs the petitioner to approach the Secretary to

Government, Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu and make a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.7992 of 2020

D.KRISHNAKUMAR. J

Jvm request for regularization of the petitioner's absence period as duty period as

well as payment of terminal benefits and appropriate orders may be passed on

the petitioner's request at the earliest.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No

costs.




                                                                                      29.03.2022
                  Index           : Yes / No
                  Internet        : Yes / No
                  Jvm

                  To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur.

2.The District Collector, Tiruppur.

Copy to The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

W.P.No.7992 of 2020

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter