Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Venkataraman vs N.Rajeswari
2022 Latest Caselaw 6087 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6087 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022

Madras High Court
G.Venkataraman vs N.Rajeswari on 24 March, 2022
                                                                                   O.S.A.No.377 of 2018



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 24.03.2022

                                                         CORAM :

                                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
                                                            AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
                                                    O.S.A.No.377 of 2018
                                      and C.M.P. Nos.16731, 16732 and 21207 of 2018


                     1. G.Venkataraman
                     2. K.Guruvan                                                            ..
                     Appellants

                                                              v.
                     1. N.Rajeswari
                     2. M.Narayanan                                                 ..
                     Respondents



                                  Original Side Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent and
                     Order 36 Rule 9 of Original Side Rules to set aside the decree and
                     judgment made in C.S.No.1048 of 2009, dated 15.03.2017.


                                  For Appellant     : Mr. S.Krishnasamy,
                                                      for Ms.K.Jenitha

                                  For Respondents : Mr.B.Ullasavelan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         O.S.A.No.377 of 2018



                                                           JUDGMENT

(Order of the Court made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.)

Challenging the judgment and decree passed in C.S.No.1048 of

2009 on the file of this court, the plaintiffs have filed the above Original

Side Appeal.

2. The plaintiffs filed the suit in C.S.No.1048 of 2009 for

declaration that the superstructure on the “B” Schedule land belongs to

the 1st Plaintiff absolutely and for permanent injunction.

3. It is not in dispute that the 1st plaintiff and the 1st defendant are

husband and wife. The 2nd plaintiff is the father of the 1st plaintiff and

the 2nd defendant is the father of the 1st defendant. It is also not in

dispute that the land in “B” schedule belongs to the 1st defendant

absolutely. It is the case of the 1st plaintiff that he put up superstructure

out of his own money and therefore,he is the absolute owner of the “B”

schedule. The defendants contended that the superstructure was put up

by them.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.No.377 of 2018

4. Before the learned Single Judge, on the side of the plaintiffs, 3

witnesses were examined and 15 documents, Exs.P.1 to P.15 were

marked and on the side of the defendants, 2 witnesses were examined

and 12 documents, Exs.D.1 to D.12 were marked.

5. The learned Single Judge taking into consideration the oral and

documentary evidences let in by both sides, found that the plaintiffs

failed to establish their case by oral and documentary evidences and

ultimately dismissed the suit, imposing cost of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty

thousand only).

6. Challenging the judgment and decree passed in C.S.No.1048

of 2009, the plaintiff's have filed the above appeal.

7. Heard Mr. S.Krishnasamy, learned counsel for the appellants

and Mr.B.Ullasavelan, learned counsel for the respondents.

8. On a careful consideration of the materials available on record

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.No.377 of 2018

and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, it could

be seen that the 1st plaintiff is claiming right over the superstructure

standing on the “B” schedule property which belongs to the 1 st

defendant. When the plaintiffs have filed the suit for declaration in

respect of the superstructure, the burden of proof lies on them to establish

that the superstructure was constructed by them.

9. It is settled law that the plaintiff should succeed in the suit on

the strength of his case and not on the weakness of the defendant.

10. In the case on hand, the plaintiffs were not in a position to

produce a single document to establish that the superstructure was put up

by the 1st plaintiff. In the absence of any evidence let in by the plaintiffs

to establish that the superstructure was put up by the 1 st plaintiff, the

learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the suit. We do not find any

ground to interfere with the judgment and decree passed by the learned

Single Judge. The Original Side Appeal is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the Original Side Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      O.S.A.No.377 of 2018




                                                         [M.D., J.]    [T.V.T.S., J.]
                                                                          24.03.2022
                     Index        : Yes/No
                     Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order
                     Rj




                                                              M. DURAISWAMY, J.
                                                                      and
                                                            T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                 O.S.A.No.377 of 2018



                                                                                  Rj




                                                           O.S.A.No.377 of 2018

and C.M.P. Nos.16731, 16732 and 21207 of 2018

24.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter