Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.United India Insurance ... vs Narendran
2022 Latest Caselaw 5988 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5988 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022

Madras High Court
M/S.United India Insurance ... vs Narendran on 24 March, 2022
                                                                            C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 24.03.2022

                                                      CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                                C.M.A.No.79 of 2022
                                                       and
                                                C.M.P.No.534 of 2022


                     M/s.United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
                     Branch Office, No.146/N, 2nd Floor,
                     Kumar Complex, Anna Slai,
                     Thiruchengodu, Namakkal District 637 211.
                     Divisional Office No.1, T.P.Hub,
                     No.104-1. Ranga Building,
                     Peramanur Main Road, Near Four Road,
                     Peramanur, Salem – 636 007                           .. Appellant
                                                         -Vs.-

                     1. Narendran
                     2. S.Rathika
                     3. C.Kaliyannan
                     4. M/s. United India Insurance Co.Ltd,
                        Divisional Office at No.1, T.P.Hub,
                        No.104-A, Ranga Building,
                        Peramanur Main Road, Near Four Road,
                        Peramanur, Salem – 636 007.                      ...Respondents

                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act. 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 26.07.2019 made
                     in M.C.O.P.No.1873 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
                     Tribunal (Special Sub Court No.-2), Salem.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

                                       For Appellant           :     Mr.D.Bhaskaran

                                       For Respondent-1        :     Mr.S.Sairaman

                                       For Respondent-2        :     Served-No Appearance

                                       For Respondents 3 & 4 :       Given up


                                                          JUDGMENT

The Insurance Company is the appellant herein, challenging the award

passed by the learned Special Sub Judge-II, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Salem in M.C.O.P.No.1873 of 2015.

2. The Insurance Company, is aggrieved by the compensation that

has been granted to the claimant. The claimant is aged 21 years and is a

second year college student. He had met with an accident on 20.08.2014, when

the claimant, while driving his Yamaha motor cycle, bearing Registration

No.TN 52 U 2756 on Kovai to Salem Main Road, was hit by Ashok Leyland

Lorry, bearing Registration No.TN 52 D 7759, belonging to the second

respondent herein and insured with the Appellant-Insurance Company. The

lorry was also travelling in the same direction and had hit the claimant's motor

cycle, as a result of which, the claimant was thrown out from the motor cycle

and had fallen on the road, on account of which, he had sustained grievous

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

injuries. He had therefore, filed a claim petition seeking compensation of a

sum of Rs.30,00,000/-.

3. The Appellant -Insurance Company had filed their counter,

denying the accident and also contending that the claimant was equally

negligent and the accident had occurred due to his fault as well and since he is

a tort-feasor, he is not entitled to compensation.

4. The Tribunal below, after considering the evidence on record, had

apportioned the liability 35% on the claimant and 65% on the lorry, the

Tribunal had awarded the following compensation:

                                                      Heads               Amount in Rs.
                                        Disability 30% x 3000                     90,000
                                        Pain and Sufferings                     3,00,000
                                        Loss of Amenities                       3,00,000
                                        Medical Expenses                        3,53,697
                                        Future Medical Expenses                 2,00,000
                                        Loss of Income                            45,000
                                        Conveyance Expenses                       20,000
                                        Extra Nourishment                       1,00,000
                                        Attender Charges                          25,000
                                        Damages                                    1,000
                                                                  Total        14,34,697

Aggrieved by the same, the Insurance Company is before this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

5. Mr.D.Bhaskaran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant –

Insurance Company would submit that the Tribunal had awarded excessive

amounts under the heads of Pain and Sufferings, Loss of Amenities, Future

Medical Expenses and Extra Nourishment. He would however concede that

the Tribunal had erred in reducing the disability to 30%, although the Doctor

had assessed the disability at 65%. He would submit that the disability may be

assessed at 40%. He would also submit that only a sum of Rs.50,000/- each

can be granted under the Heads of Pain and Sufferings, Loss of Amenities and

Future Medical Expenses, considering the nature of injuries sustained by the

claimant as also his age. He would submit that no amount can be granted

under the head of Loss of Income, since the claimant was only a student and

not employed. Therefore the award of the Tribunal has to be modified as

follows:

S.No. Description Amount Amount Award awarded by awarded confirmed or Tribunal by this enhanced or Court granted or (Rs) reduced (Rs) 1 Disability 30% x 3000 90,000 1,20,000 Enhanced 2 Pain and Sufferings 3,00,000 50,000 Reduced 3 Loss of Amenities 3,00,000 50,000 Reduced 4 Medical Expenses 3,53,697 3,53,697 Confirmed 5 Future Medical Expenses 2,00,000 50,000 Reduced 6 Loss of Income 45,000 - NIL 7 Conveyance Expenses 20,000 25,000 Enhanced

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

S.No. Description Amount Amount Award awarded by awarded confirmed or Tribunal by this enhanced or Court granted or (Rs) reduced (Rs) 8 Extra Nourishment 1,00,000 25,000 Reduced 9 Attender Charges 25,000 25,000 Confirmed 10 Damages 1,000 1,000 Confirmed TOTAL 14,34,697 6,99,697 Reduced by Rounded Rs.7,35,000 Off to 7,00,000

6. Considering the fact that 35% of the liability has been mulcted on

the first respondent/claimant, he has to forego a sum of Rs.2,45,000/- and the

appellant-Insurance Company is liable to pay a sum of Rs.4,55,000/- which

constitute 65% together with interest.

7. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and the

compensation of Rs.14,34,697/- awarded by the Tribunal is hereby reduced to

a sum of Rs.6,99,696 (Rounded Off to Rs.7,00,000/-) together with interest

@ 7.5 % per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The

Insurance Company is directed to deposit the said amount Rs.4,55,000/- to the

credit of M.C.O.P.No.1873 of 2015 together with interest @ 7.5% per annum

from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit and costs as awarded by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

the Tribunal, less, the amount, if any already deposited, within a period of six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgement. On such deposit

being made, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the amount now determined

by this Court, along with interest and costs, as apportioned by the Tribunal,

after adjusting the amount if any already withdrawn. The Insurance Company

is permitted to withdraw any excess amount deposited by them. No costs.

Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

24.03.2022 Internet: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking

srn

To

1. The learned Special Sub Judge-II, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Salem

2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.79 of 2022

P.T.ASHA.J srn

C.M.A.No.79 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.534 of 2022

24.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter