Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Eswari vs Rajendran
2022 Latest Caselaw 5982 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5982 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022

Madras High Court
R.Eswari vs Rajendran on 24 March, 2022
                                                                                  C.M.A.No.709 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 24.03.2022

                                                           CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                                   C.M.A.No.709 of 2022

                 R.Eswari                                                              ... Appellant

                                                            Vs.

                 Rajendran
                                                                                     ... Respondent

                 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Family
                 Court Act 1984 to set aside the fair and final order dated 12.04.2018 made in
                 I.A.No.241 of 2017 in H.M.O.P.N.1215 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Family
                 Judge, Coimbatore.

                                   For Appellant       :    Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja

                                   For Respondent      :    Mr.S.Nagarajan




                 1/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.M.A.No.709 of 2022




                                                      JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.]

We have heard Mr.K.S.Karthik Raja, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant/wife and Mr.S.Nagarajan, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent/husband.

2.Challenging the order passed by the Principal Family Judge, Coimbatore

in I.A.No.241 of 2017 in H.M.O.P.No.1215 of 2016 dated 12.04.2018, the

present appeal has been filed.

3.The facts in brief:-

The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was performed on

27.08.2015 as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. It appears that there is no issue.

The appellant/wife filed HMOP No.1215 of 2016 under Section 9 of the Hindu

Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent/husband filed

HMOP No.1611 of 2018 for dissolution of marriage. I.A.No.241 of 2017 was

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.709 of 2022

filed by the appellant/wife in HMOP No.1215 of 2016 seeking interim

maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month and another Rs.10,000/- towards litigation

expenses. It is her case that her husband is working in the Tamil Nadu Electricity

Board and he was paid Rs.44,000/- per month, but she is unemployed.

4.The respondent contested the petition stating that though his salary was

Rs.44,000/-, he is paying substantial amount towards interest for the loan

obtained at the time of marriage. That apart, he has to maintain his parents. The

learned Judge, after analyzing the materials produced by the parties, has directed

the respondent/husband to pay Rs.4,500/- per month as interim maintenance from

09.04.2017 and Rs.5,000/- for litigation expenses.

5.It is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that

the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court is very low considering the

fact that the respondent/husband is earning Rs.47,183/- per month.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.709 of 2022

6.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/husband

would state that the main HMOP for restitution of conjugal rights was filed by the

appellant/wife to take revenge against the respondent and also to drag on the

proceedings endlessly. It is further stated that the divorce petition was filed since

the appellant/wife has committed cruelty on the respondent.

7. We have considered the rival submission of the both the parties and

perused the materials available on record.

8.In the instant case, it is an admitted fact that the marriage between the

appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 27.08.2015 and there is no issue

for them. It is also seen that from 2016, they have been living apart, which shows

that they did not live together even for a period of one year. The salary slips

(Exs.R1 and R3) produced by the respondent/husband show that take home

salary of the respondent was Rs.17,242/- per month. The learned counsel

appearing for the respondent would state that a sum of Rs.9,000/- has been paid

to settle the loan amount and Ex.R.2 was produced to prove the medical expenses.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.709 of 2022

He would further state that the entire arrears amount will be paid today.

9. In the light of the above fact, we are of the view that the monthly

maintenance can be enhanced to Rs.6,000/-. Accordingly, the respondent/husband

is directed to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.6,000/- per month from March

2022 onwards. The litigation expenses ordered by the Family Court is confirmed.

The respondent/husband shall pay interim maintenance on or before 5 th day of

every English Calendar month.

10.It is represented that a memo has been filed for joint trial of both the

Original Petitions and the matters are posted today for commencement of Trial.

So, the Family Court shall dispose of both the Original Petitions as expeditiously

as possible preferably within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order. The parties shall not file any unnecessary petitions to drag on

the proceedings and the appellant is directed to co-operate for early disposal of the

Original Petitions as stated above.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.709 of 2022

11.With the above observations and directions, this Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

                                                                [M.K.K.S.,J.]        [V.S.G.,J.]
                                                                          24.03.2022
                 skn
                 Index          : Yes/No
                 Speaking Order :Yes/No
                 To

                 1.The Principal Family Judge,
                   Coimbatore.

                 2.The Section Officer,
                   V.R.Section,
                  Madras High Court,
                  Chennai.






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                          C.M.A.No.709 of 2022




                                  K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.
                                                    and
                                        V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

                                                          skn




                                      JUDGMENT MADE IN
                                       C.M.A.No.709 of 2022




                                                  24.03.2022






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter