Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4552 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2022
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :08.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax - I
Tiruchirapalli.
...Appellant
-vs-
M/s. Mallow International,
SF 535, Semmadai,
Salem Bye-Pass Road, Karur.
...Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 09.07.2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, Chennai in I.T.A.No.564/Mds/2010.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan
Senior Standing Counsel
Ms.V.Pushpa
For Respondent : Mr.Vikram Vijayaraghavan
for Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.) This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue, calling in
question the correctness of the order dated 09.07.2010 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.564/Mds/2010,
relating to the assessment year 2000-07. On 28.2.2011, this Tax Case Appeal
is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was entitled for depreciation at the rate of 80% and 40% applicable to windmills based on the date of putting to use, even on the electrical fittings and civil work, on which depreciation was allowable only at the rate of 10% and 5%?"
2. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
3. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [J.S.N.P.,
J.]
08.03.2022
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
gba/msr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
gba/msr To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench.
Tax Case Appeal No.1455 of 2010
08.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!