Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pitchaikani Ammal vs Marikani Ammal
2022 Latest Caselaw 4174 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4174 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2022

Madras High Court
Pitchaikani Ammal vs Marikani Ammal on 3 March, 2022
                                                                        CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED : 03.03.2022

                                                 CORAM :

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

                                          CMA (MD)No.85 of 2011
                                                 and
                                           MP.(MD)No.1 of 2011

                  1.Pitchaikani Ammal
                  2. Sahadevan
                  3. Chandra
                  4. Jenagan
                  5. Velan
                  6. Sekar
                  7. Indirani
                  8. Saraswathi                                  ... Appellants


                                                   Vs.
                      Kannipalam Ammal (Died)
                     Jeyarajakani Ammal (Died)
                  1. Marikani Ammal
                  2. Rathinapandi Nadar
                  3. Ganapathi Pandi
                  4. Chandrasekar
                  5. Saraswathi                                  ...Respondents


                  1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

                  PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed order 43 Rule 1 (t) of CPC, to
                  set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.07.2010 in I.A No.94 of 2009
                  in A.S No.68 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Valliyoor.


                                  For Appellant      : Mr.P.Bala Murugan
                                                      for M/s. Jaya Paul Associates
                                  For Respondent     : Mr.S.J.Chakkaravarthy
                                                       for M/s.Eddy & Emboss Law Firm.


                                                    JUDGMENT

The appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.9 of 1988 before the

learned Principal District Munsif, Valliyoor. The suit was filed for the

relief of recovery of possession. The appellant has also filed a suit in

O.S.No.629 of 1988, before the same Court, for the relief of declaration of

title to the suit property and also for permanent injunction. After a common

trial, both the suits have been dismissed by a common judgement. Hence

the appellants have preferred an appeal before the Principal Subordinate

Court, Tirunelveli, in A.S.No.76 of 2004 which is made over to Principal

District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli and A.S.No.68 of 2004 is made

over to the Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

2.While, the A.S.No.76 of 2004, which is arising out of a

common judgment, is pending before the Principal Subordinate Judge,

Tirunelveli, the A.S.No.68 of 2004 was listed before the Subordinate Court,

Valliyoor and the same was dismissed for default on 02.08.2004. Hence

the plaintiff / appellant has filed two interlocutory applications. One under

Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay and another

interlocutory application to restore the first appeal which was dismissed for

default. The condone delay application in I.A.No.309 of 2007 was allowed

thereby, the delay of 1164 days was condoned. Consequently I.A.No.94 of

2009 for restoration of the appeal was taken up and the same was dismissed

and hence this Civil Miscellaneous appeal.

3.Heard the rival submissions made by the parties.

4.Arising out of a common judgment, O.S.No.9 of 1988 filed by

the one party and O.S.No.629 of 1988 filed by the other party, a common

judgment was rendered and two separate appeals have been filed.

However, by administrative action, one appeal was made over to I

Additional Subordinate Court. It has put a trial and it appears to be the

reason for the dismissal is for default and hence an opportunity has to be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

given since the other A.S.No.76 of 2004 is still pending with the Principal

Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

5.Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. The

order dated 06.07.2010 made in I.A.No.94 of 2009 in A.S.No.68 of 2004

on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor, is set aside and A.S.No.68

of 2004 is ordered to be restored to file and also directed to be transferred

to the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, to be tried along with

A.S.No.76 of 2004 and the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli

shall dispose of the same within a period of four months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.03.2022

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes / No

pnn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

To

1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

3.The Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor.

4.The Record Clerk, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

pnn

CMA (MD)No.85 of 2011 and MP.(MD)No.1 of 2011

03.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter