Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10866 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022
Tr.C.M.P.No.371 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Tr.C.M.P. No.371 of 2022
and C.M.P.No.7070 of 2022
Nivetha ... Petitioner
..Vs..
N.Mohanasundaram ... Respondent
Prayer:- Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw
H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 pending on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul
and transfer the same to the Principal Family Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.Mutharaiyan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatesh
ORDER
This petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 pending
on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul and transfer the same to the
Principal Family Court, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.371 of 2022
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned
counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
3.The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The
marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on
09.12.2018 as per Hindu rites and customs. Since, the relationship
between the couples went bitter, the Respondent/Husband filed
H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul, against
the petitioner seeking divorce. Now, the petitioner herein who is the wife
has preferred the present petition to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 on
the file of the Family Court, Dindigul and transfer the same to the file of
the learned Judge, Principal Family Court, Chennai.
4. The petitioner has stated that she is staying with 3 year old
minor son and aged parents and it is very difficult for her to travel from
Chennai to Dindigul for attending the Court proceedings at Dindigul.
5. It is needless to state that in matrimonial proceedings,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.371 of 2022
preference should be given to the convenience of the wife. The said
position has been settled in various Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court and more particularly in the Judgments reported in 2008 (9) SCC
353 [Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar
Gupta] and AIR 2002 SC 396 [Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and
another]. Infact as per the amended Section 19(iii-a) of the Hindu
Marriage Act, 1955, the wife is guarded with the right to file proceedings
in the place where she resides. The above amendment was brought with
the object of facilitating the wife to participate in the matrimonial
proceedings without any hardship. In view of the above reasons, I feel
that the prayer of the petitioner should be considered favourably.
6.Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.
The petition in H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 filed by the Respondent is ordered
to be withdrawn from the file of Family Court, Dindigul and transferred
to the file of the Family Court, Chennai. The learned Judge, Family Court,
Dindigul, is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.371 of 2022
H.M.O.P.No.3 of 2022 to the file of the Family Court, Chennai, within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
22.06.2022 vkr Index:Yes/No Speaking Order:Yes/No
To
1.The Judge, Family Court, Dindigul.
2.The Judge, Family Court, Chennai.
R.N.MANJULA,J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.371 of 2022
vkr
Tr.C.M.P. No.371 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.7070 of 2022
22.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!