Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10613 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2022
W.P.No.18686 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.18686 of 2012
1. S.Balaji
2. M.Jeyakumar .. Petitioners
vs
1. The Secretary to Government,
Personnel and Administration Reforms
Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Public Services Commission,
No.1, Commercial Tax Annexe Building,
Greams Road, Chennai-6. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Declaration to declare the provisions of the Tamil
Nadu Appointment on Preferential Basis in the services under the State
of Persons Studies in Tamil Medium Act, 2010 (T.N. Act of 40/2010)
dt. 29.11.2010 as ultra vires and unconstitutional and to be non-est.
For the Petitioner : Mr.M.Sriram
For the Respondents : Mr.M.Muthukumar
State Govt. Pleader for R-1
: Mr.V.Govardhanan,
Stdg. Counsel for R-2
___________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.18686 of 2012
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
By this writ petition, challenge is made to the Tamil Nadu
appointment on preferential basis in the services under the State of
Persons studied in Tamil Medium Act, 2010.
2. It is admitted by the parties that the issue raised in this
writ petition has already been answered by a Division Bench of this
Court in the case of G.Sakthi Rao vs. Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu and Others, reported in (2021) 4
MLJ 193.
3. In view of the statement aforesaid, we could not take a
different view as has already been taken by a Coordinate Division
Bench holding the provisions to be intra vires.
4. The writ petition was filed otherwise in the year 2012 in
reference to a particular selection. A period of ten years has
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18686 of 2012
already passed in between and therefore, presumption remains that
the petitioner may have been settled properly. However, if any
grievance still remains after holding the provisions of the Act to be
constitutionally valid, the petitioner would be at liberty to take
appropriate remedy under the law.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the
order passed in the judgment referred supra. No costs.
(M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.) 20.06.2022 Index : Yes/No sra
To:
1. The Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administration Reforms Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Services Commission, No.1, Commercial Tax Annexe Building, Greams Road, Chennai-6.
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18686 of 2012
M.N.Bhandari, CJ.
and N.Mala, J.
(sra)
W.P.No.18686 of 2012
20.06.2022
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!