Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Wilson Ganamani @ Vilsamani vs The State Represented Through
2022 Latest Caselaw 11935 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11935 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2022

Madras High Court
S.Wilson Ganamani @ Vilsamani vs The State Represented Through on 5 July, 2022
                                                                       Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 05.07.2022

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                          Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022


                     1.S.Wilson Ganamani @ Vilsamani

                     2.J.Pratheep @ Anti Pratheep

                     3.K.Selvan @ Selvakumar              ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4

                                                          Vs.


                     1.The State represented through
                       The Sub Inspector of Police,
                       Kanyakumari Police Station,
                       Kanyakumari District.
                       (Crime No.227 of 2007)                      ... Respondent No.1/
                                                                             Complainant


                     2.R.Shanmuga Perumal                          ...Respondent No.2/
                                                                       Defacto Complainant

                     3.R.Selvan                                 ...Respondent No.3/Injured

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
                     praying to quash in C.C. No. 130 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial
                     Magistrate No. I, Nagercoil and quash the same.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/6
                                                                           Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

                                        For Petitioners    : Mr.K.A.Raamakrishnan

                                        For R-1            : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor.




                                                           ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to to quash the case

in C.C.No.130 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. I,

Nagercoil.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a quarrel between

the petitioner and the third respondent in the marriage function. Due to

wordy quarrel arose between them, the petitioners attacked the third

respondent and he was injured. Hence, a complaint was registered by the

second respondent, who is the brother of the third respondent. After

completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been laid and it has been

taken cognizance in C.C.No.130 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate No. I, Nagercoil. and it is pending for trial.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

3.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have

decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably

among themselves.

4. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court

which have been signed by the petitioners and the private respondents

and also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the private

respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were

identified by Mr.R.YesuRajan, SSI of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station

as well as by the learned Counsels appearing for both the parties. This

Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties

have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

5. In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and the

parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the

matter, the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the

offence under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

6. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in

(2012)10 SCC 303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of

Gujrath) reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

7. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments

of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping

the proceedings in C.C.No.130 of 2007 pending before the learned

Judicial Magistrate No. I, Nagercoil, even though, the offences involved

are not compoundable in nature.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed

and as a sequel, the proceedings in C.C.No.130 of 2007 on the file of

the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Nagercoil. is quashed and the terms of

joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

05.07.2022

Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order Nsr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

To

1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No. I, Nagercoil.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

Nsr

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11967 of 2022

05.07.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter