Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 582 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2022
T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Coimbatore. ... Appellant
Versus
M/s.Well Knit Industries,
S.F.No.314/5,
15, Valampalayam Main Road,
Anupparpalayam Post,
Tirupur. ...
Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “D” Bench,
dated 11.01.2008 in I.TA.No.1838/Mds/2006.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan,
Senior Standing Counsel
Assisted by M/s.K.G.Usharani,
Junior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : No appearance
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant / Revenue,
challenging the order dated 11.01.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Bench 'D', Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1838/Mds/2006, relating to the
assessment year 2001-02.
2.By order dated 24.11.2009, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law:
“Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that levying interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, when the liability to pay advance tax arose only due to an amendment to Section 80HHC interested by Taxation have Amendment Act, 2005 retrospectively w.e.f. 1.4.1992?"
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not
exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax
effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4.In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said
to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn,
keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in an
appropriate case. No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)
10.01.2022
av
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
av
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai “D” Bench.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore.
T.C.A.No.1309 of 2009
10.01.2022
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!