Madras High Court
Indus Towers Limited vs The Commissioner Of Police on 3 January, 2022
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
Indus Towers Limited,
Represented by its Authorized Signatory,
Mr. S.Prasanna. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Ambattur Division, Greater Chennai.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Avadi Range, Greater Chennai.
4. The Inspector of Police,
T-10, Thirumullaivoyal Police Station,
Chennai.
5. The District Collector,
Thiruvallur District.
6. The Commissioner,
Greater Chennai Corporation.
Page No.1 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
7. The Tahsildar
Avadi Taluk, Thiruvallur district. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to
provide necessary police protection to the petitioner for their mobile
phone tower works at the premises being about 500 Sq Ft of land at
No.7A, 9th Cross Street, Saravana Nagar, Thirumullaivoyal, Avadi Taluk,
Chennai- 600 062, on the representation dated 04.08.2021, under online
reference No.BUM21178254 dated 23.11.2021 and direct the
respondents 5 to 7 to render necessary cooperation to the respondents 1
to 4 in the matter.
For Petitioner : Mr. S.Anil Sandeep
For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
Additional Public Prosecutor.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of
mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to provide necessary police
protection to the petitioner for their mobile phone tower works at the
premises being about 500 Sq Ft of land at No.7A, 9th Cross Street,
Saravana Nagar, Thirumullaivoyal, Avadi Taluk, Chennai- 600 062, on
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
the representation dated 04.08.2021, under online reference No.
BUM21178254 dated 23.11.2021 and direct the respondents 5 to 7 to
render necessary co-operation to the respondents 1 to 4 in the matter.
2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in the
business of Operation and Maintenance of Mobile phone towers across
India for all the mobile phone operators/service providers providing
broadband Internet services and other allied services. For the said
purpose, cell phone tower is going to be erected. The petitioner had also
entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the property and had
taken steps to install the cell phone tower. Already, the Government of
Tamil Nadu has granted exemption to all the Telecom companies to install
the cell phone towers by virtue of Government Order passed in
G.O.Ms.No.2, dated 01.04.2002.
3.When the petitioner attempted to erect the cell phone tower, some
people with vested interest claiming to be neighbours have been causing
hindrance and preventing the workers from carrying out the construction
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
work. In this regard, the petitioner gave a complaint to the 4th respondent
on 04.08.2021, seeking police protection. However, the 4th respondent
had not acted upon the said complaint and therefore, the present Petition
has been filed.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that the issue involved in this petition is covered by the earlier Judgments
of this Court. The learned counsel brought to the notice of this Court the
order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018 dt.28.06.2018.
5.It will be appropriate to extract the relevant portions of the order
in Crl.O.P.No.16618 of 2018, which is extracted hereunder:-
“2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that the petitioner's company had the contract
agreement for installation of cell phone tower with
M/s.Indus Towers Limited, a company registered
under the provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956.
It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that whenever the petitioner's company
attempted to erect transmission cell phone tower,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
publics are causing interference. The learned counsel
for the petitioner also submitted that by order dated
05.03.2015, the Honourable First Bench of this Court,
in W.P.Nos.24976 of 2008 and etc., batch, held that
because of the advancement in the science, no one has
prevented to erect cell phone towers. It is also
submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint
dated 24.02.2016 to the first respondent police
seeking police protection, for which C.S.R.No.42 of
2016 and since the same has not been considered so
far, he has come up with the present petition for the
relief stated supra.
3.Heard the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of
the case, the petitioner is directed to send a fresh
representation to the respondent and on receipt of the
same, the respondent is directed to consider the
representation to be submitted by the petitioner and
pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance
with law, within a period of one week from the date of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
receipt of copy of this order.
5.With the above directions, this Criminal
Original Petition is disposed of.”
6.This Court has consistently taken the view that no one can be
prevented from erecting the cell phone towers on a mere apprehension
about the effect of radiation from the cell phone tower. The apprehension
does not have a scientific backing. Till a positive finding is given in this
regard, cell phone towers cannot be prevented to be installed on mere
apprehensions.
7.For the reasons stated above, there shall be a direction to the 4 th
respondent police to provide police protection to the petitioner for erection
of the cell phone tower. The 4th respondent police shall ensure that the
entire process goes on in a smooth manner, without giving raise to any
law and order problem.
8. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
costs.
03.01.2022 Index: Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
sli
To
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Ambattur Division, Greater Chennai.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Avadi Range, Greater Chennai.
4. The Inspector of Police,
T-10, Thirumullaivoyal Police Station,
Chennai.
5. The District Collector,
Thiruvallur District.
6. The Commissioner,
Greater Chennai Corporation.
7. The Tahsildar
Avadi Taluk Thiruvallur district.
8. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
sli
W.P.No.27934 of 2021
03.01.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
