Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Vasanthakumar vs The Principal Chief Engineer-Cum
2022 Latest Caselaw 1002 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1002 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022

Madras High Court
P. Vasanthakumar vs The Principal Chief Engineer-Cum on 21 January, 2022
                                                                                 W.A.No.39 of 2022

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATE: 21.01.2022

                                                    CORAM:

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                             AND
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                              W.A.No.39 of 2022



                     P. Vasanthakumar                                           ... Appellants
                                                         v.

                     The Principal Chief Engineer-cum-
                     Chief Engineer(General),
                     Public Works Department,
                     Chepauk,
                     Chennai - 600 005.                                        ... Respondent



                     Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order
                     made in W.P.No.10769 of 2009, dated 03.10.2019


                                  For Appellants     : Mr.K.Soundararajan

                                  For Respondents : Mr. R.U. Dinesh Rajkumar,
                                                    Additional Government Pleader.



                                                   JUDGMENT

Page 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.39 of 2022

(Judgment of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.)

Challenging the order passed in W.P.No.10769 of 2009, the Writ

Petitioner has filed the above Writ Appeal.

2. The appellant filed the Writ Petition to issue a Writ of

Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent dated

20.02.2009, to quash the same and to direct the respondent to appoint

the petitioner in any one of the post incommensurate with the petitioner's

educational qualification in Public Works Department on compassionate

ground.

3.1 It is the case of the appellant that his father was working in

the Public Works Department and he died on 13.10.1990 leaving behind

his wife, the appellant and another son. At the time of death of the

appellant's father, Panneer Selvam, the appellant was 2 ½ years old.

After the death of the said Panneer Selvam, his wife, viz., Thangamani

Paneer Selvam, submitted an application dated 04.01.1993 seeking for

Compassionate appointment. Thereafter, the appellant submitted his

Page 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.39 of 2022

application on 02.05.2007 seeking for Compassionate appointment.

3.2 It is also the case of the appellant that services of his father

was regularized only on 06.02.2007. Since the appellant has submitted

his application after a lapse of 17 years, the respondent rejected the

application.

4. Mr.K.Soundararajan, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant submitted that even the application submitted by the petitioner's

mother,Tmt. Thangamani Paneer Selvam has not yet been considered by

the respondent.

5. Since the mother of the petitioner has not filed any Writ Petition

seeking for any direction with regard to her application dated 04.01.1993,

we are not adverting to any finding with regard to the application

submitted by the appellant's mother.

6. It is settled law that appointment on compassionate ground has

to be given to such of those person who are eligible for appointment at the

Page 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.39 of 2022

time of death of the employee. In the case on hand, the appellant was

not eligible for providing compassionate appointment for the reason that

he was only 2 ½ years old at the time of death of his father. As rightly

observed by the learned Single Judge, appointment on compassionate

basis is not a matter of right and it is only to tide over the situation to

which the family is put to on the death of the sole bread winner of the

family. The appellant has submitted the application seeking for

compassionate appointment after a lapse of 17 years. When the

appellant had managed to run the family for more than 17 years, there is

no eminent necessity for providing any compassionate appointment.

7. The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration all these

aspects, rightly dismissed the Writ Petition. We do not find any ground

to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The Writ

Appeal is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

                                                                     [M.D., J.]    [J.S.N.P., J.]

                     Page 4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.39 of 2022

01.12.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes Rj

To The Principal Chief Engineer-cum-

Chief Engineer(General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

Page 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.39 of 2022

M. DURAISWAMY, J.

and J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD ,J

Rj

W.A.No.39 of 2022

21.01.2022

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter