Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3660 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2022
S.A.No.264 of 1997
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
S.A.No.264 of 1997
and
C.M.P.No.2967 of 1997
1.R.Aramayee
2.Boomani
3.Indirani
4.Rajkumar
5.Malathi
6.Selvaraj
7.Baskaran
8.Kadiresan
9.Padmavathi : Appellants
Vs.
1.Chinniah Jayarathinam
Rep. by Power Agent
Savarimuthu
2.Annalaxmi
3.Rethinambal
4.Rajambal
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.264 of 1997
5.Sundarambal
6.Thiagarajan
7.Muthu Thevar
8.Aramayee
9.C.Arunachala Thevar
10.Mani Nayar
11.Vemban
12.Kumaran
13.Kasi Thevar
Raman Poosari [Died]
15.Kaliyan
16.Meyyan
17.Velu @ Ramiah
18.Mariappan Thevar
Ponniah [Died]
20.Panchali @ Veerappan
21.Mamundi
22.Mangayee
23.Aramayee
24.Lakshmi
25.Veeramani
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.264 of 1997
26.Saravanan
27.Sakthivel
28.Sivakumar
29.Minor Pandichelvi
Rep. by her mother – R.24 : Respondents
[R.24 to R.29 are brought on record as Legal
Representatives of deceased R.19, vide order dated
03.04.2018].
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil
Procedure Code as against the judgment and decree dated
17.07.1996 in A.S.No.25 of 1993 on the file of the District
Court, Pudukottai, confirming the judgment and decree dated
22.03.1989 in O.S.No.74 of 1985 on the file of the
Subordinate Court, Pudukottai.
For Appellants : Mr.P.Thiagarajan
For Respondents : Mr.Pala Ramasamy
for RR.1, 4 to 6
Steps Due for RR.2, 3
Given up for RR.7 to 13,
15 to 18, 20, 21, 23
Died – RR.14, 19
No representation
for RR.22, 24 to 26, 28, 29
Left – R.27
*****
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.264 of 1997
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed as against the judgment and decree
passed by the learned District Judge, Pudukottai, in
A.S.No.25 of 1993, dated 17.07.1996, confirming the
judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate
Judge, Pudukottai, in O.S.No.74 of 1985, dated 22.03.1989.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today,
learned Counsel for the appellants and respondents
submitted that the parties have settled the matter out of
Court. The appellants' Counsel has also filed a memo to
that effect, dated 25.02.2022.
3.In view of the above position, this second appeal
stands closed, as settled out of Court. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands
closed.
Index : Yes / No 25.02.2022 Internet : Yes gk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.264 of 1997
To
1.The District Judge, Pudukottai.
2.The Subordinate Judge, Pudukottai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.264 of 1997
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
gk
S.A.No.264 of 1997
25.02.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!