Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Jeyalakshmi vs The Director Of Pension
2022 Latest Caselaw 2021 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2021 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2022

Madras High Court
K.Jeyalakshmi vs The Director Of Pension on 8 February, 2022
                                                                          W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019



                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED : 08.02.2022

                                                      CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                               W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019


                     K.Jeyalakshmi                                             ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.The Director of Pension,
                       259, Anna Salai,
                       DMS Compound,
                       Chennai-600 006.

                     2.The Joint Director of Health Services,
                       Thoothukudi,
                       Thoothukudi District.

                     3.The Treasury Officer,
                       District Treasury,
                       Thoothukudi.

                     4.The United India Insurance Company Limited,
                       Divisional Office 010600,
                       5th Floor, PLA Rathna Tower,
                       212, Anna Salai,
                      Chennai-600 006.                                        ... Respondents



                     _________
                     Page 1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019



                                   Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
                     records relating to the proceedings of the third respondent made in
                     Na.Ka.No.2827/2017/Ra3 dated 23.06.2017 and quash the same and
                     consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to settle the medical expenses of
                     the petitioner's deceased husband to the tune of Rs.84,190/- with interest.


                                   For Petitioner     :         Mr.M.Suresh Kumar

                                   For Respondent     :         Mr.M.Ramesh
                                                                Government Advocate
                                                                for RR1 to 3
                                                                No-appearance for R4



                                                          ******

                                                          ORDER

The order impugned dated 23.06.2017 reveals that the medical

reimbursement claim of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the

husband of the petitioner undertook treatment in a non-network hospital.

2. Admittedly, the husband of the petitioner was a pensioner and

eligible for reimbursement. He was suddenly admitted in the hospital at the

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

age of 76 and undertook treatment in nearby hospital at Laxmi Poly clinic,

Tuticorin. He was taking treatment as in-patient from 28.08.2014 to

07.09.2014. Surgery was conducted on 29.08.2014 and the discharge

summary would reveal the nature of surgery undergone by the husband of

the petitioner. The husband of the petitioner subsequently died on

13.02.2015. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for medical

reimbursement claim. The claim petition was rejected on the ground that the

treatment was taken by the husband of the petitioner in a non-network

hospital.

3. Many number of judgments were delivered holding that the

Authorities Competent are bound to verify the genunity of the treatment

taken by the employee. The benefit of Medical reimbursement cannot be

denied merely on the ground that the treatment was taken in non-network

hospital. The emergency situation warranting urgent treatment for a person

is to be considered. This being the principles adopted, the Authorities

Competent cannot mechanically reject the medical reimbursement claim by

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

stating that the treatment was not taken in the approved hospital.

4. Providing a decent medical treatment is a right to live

enunciated under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Thus, the medical

reimbursement claim cannot be rejected on flimsy technical grounds. The

genunity of the treatment is to be verified, but not the hospital, in which the

treatment was taken. When a person urgently needs a medical treatment, no

one can expect that he should be admitted in the hospitals listed out in the

Government Order. It may not be practicable in such circumstances.

5. This being the factum, the order impugned is not in consonance

with the established principles laid down by the High Court in the matter of

medical reimbursement. Consequently, the order impugned passed by the

fourth respondent in Na.Ka.No.2827/2017/Ra3 dated 23.06.2017 is

quashed. The respondents are directed to settle the medical reimbursement

claim of the petitioner as per his eligibility within a period of eight weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs.

08.02.2022

ssb

To

1.The Director of Pension, 259, Anna Salai, DMS Compound, Chennai-600 006.

2.The Joint Director of Health Services, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Thoothukudi.

4.The United India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office 010600, 5th Floor, PLA Rathna Tower, 212, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

ssb

W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2019

08.02.2022

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter