Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Geetha Lakshmi vs 3 The Block Educational Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 1575 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1575 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2022

Madras High Court
Geetha Lakshmi vs 3 The Block Educational Officer on 1 February, 2022
                                                                                  W.P. No.851 of 2021
                                                              -1-

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     Dated :: 01.02.2022

                                                           CORAM:

                                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

                                                    W.P. No.851 of 2021

                     Geetha Lakshmi                                         ...   Petitioner

                                   versus

                     1     Director of Elementary Education,
                           DPI Campus, Chennai 600 009

                     2     The District Educational Officer
                           Thirupattur, Vellore District

                     3     The Block Educational officer
                           Thirupattur Block,
                           Vellore Distirct                                 ...   Respondents

                                  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to
                     step up the pay of the petitioner on par with her Junior A. Tamil Selvi
                     from the date on which anomaly arose with all monetary benefits as
                     per the judgment of this Honble Court in W.P.(MD) No.742 of 2018
                     dated 07.02.2018.



                     For Petitioner                 ...   Ms.Dakshayani Reddy

                     For Respondents                ...   Mr.Abishek Moorthy
                                                          Government Advocate


                                                          ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.851 of 2021

The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as a

Secondary Grade Teacher in Nemili Block, Vellore District, on

07.10.1996. She was transferred to the Thirupattur Block on

05.03.1997. One Tamil Selvi, who is petitioner's junior, was appointed

as a Secondary Grade Teacher in K.V.Kuppam Block on 25.07.1997

and she came on transfer to Thirupattur Block on 05.08.1998. On

07.10.2006, the petitioner was granted the selection grade scale of

pay. Thereafter, on 18.01.2013, she was promoted as Elementary

School Headmaster.

2. In 2017, the petitioner's junior viz., the said Tamil Selvi, was

granted special grade pay, and in 2018 she was promoted as

Elementary School Headmaster and on such appointment, she started

drawing higher pay than the petitioner. The present writ petition has

been filed seeking to step-up the pay of the petitioner on par with her

junior, Tamil Selvi.

3. Ms.Dakshayini Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner,

would submit that as far as the original date of appointment is

concerned, the petitioner is senior to Tamil Selvi and she was

appointed on 07.10.2006 itself as Secondary Grade Teacher as against

the appointment of Tamil Selvi on 25.07.1997. The only reason that

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.851 of 2021

has been given for not considering the claim for stepping-up of pay for

the petitioner is that both the petitioner as well as Tamil Selvi were

appointed in different blocks and therefore, they cannot claim parity in

the pay. According to the learned counsel, the reason was orally

conveyed to the petitioner and therefore, the writ petition has been

filed with a prayer for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the

respondents to step-up the pay of the petitioner on par with her junior

Tamil Selvi on the date on which the anomaly arose, with all

consequential monetary benefits.

4. In response to the notice ordered in the writ petition,

Mr.Abishek Moorthy, learned Government Advocate, has entered

appearance on behalf of the respondents and a counter-affidavit has

been filed. In the counter-affidavit, in paragraph No.9, a comparison

statement has also been tabulated wherein the dates of appointment

of the petitioner vis-a-vis Tamil Selvi were admitted. But the reason

for not considering the claim of the petitioner was that both the

petitioner as well as Tamil Selvi were appointed in different blocks and

therefore, the petitioner cannot claim parity on the basis of a junior

getting more pay than a senior.

5. At this, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.851 of 2021

that the issue whether such parity could be claimed when two

employees are posted in different blocks is no more res integra as the

same is covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court. The

learned counsel referred to the order in The Director of Elementary

Education, Chennai vs. I.Poongodi (W.A.(MD) No.1220 of 2019), dated

14.11.2019. This Court, in identical circumstances, has held as under

in paragraphs 6 and 7:

“6. The only argument put forth before us in this appeal is that the respondent / writ petitioner cannot compare himself to R.Muthu Nesam, because, the respondent / writ petitioner was working in a different Panchayat Union and transferred to T.Vadipatti. However, the case of R.Muthu Nesam also is not different. Therefore, the distinction sought to be drawn by the appellants is not sustainable. Further more, there is nothing on record to show that R.Muthu Nesam was drawing higher pay, while he was working in Kadamalai Mayiladumparai, Panchayat Union for the appellants to contend that it is a reason for granting higher pay to R.Muthu Nesam.

7. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the respondent / writ petitioner pay has to be set out over his junior in W.A.(MD)No.1220/2019 T.Vadipatti. Therefore, we find that the direction issued by the learned writ Court calls for no

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.851 of 2021

interference. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.”

6. The learned counsel for the respondents would have no

quarrel with the proposition laid down by the Division Bench and has

graciously acknowledged that the claim of the petitioner is fully

covered by the ruling of the Division Bench.

7. In view of the admitted position, the writ petition is allowed

and the respondents are directed to step-up the pay of the petitioner

on par with her junior Tamil Selvi from the date on which the anomaly

arose, with all monetary benefits, in terms of the ruling of the Division

Bench, as aforementioned. The respondents are directed to pass

appropriate orders in this regard within a period of four weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. The writ petition is allowed accordingly. There will be no order

as to costs.

01.02.2022 Index: Yes/no tar

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.851 of 2021

V.PARTHIBAN, J.

                                                                                     (tar)

                     To

                     1     Director of Elementary Education,
                           DPI Campus, Chennai 600 009

                     2     The District Educational Officer
                           Thirupattur, Vellore District

                     3     The Block Educational officer
                           Thirupattur Block,
                           Vellore Distirct



                                                                    W.P. No.851 of 2021




                                                                         01.02.2022




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter