Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18201 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2022
W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
Chithradevi ... Appellant/Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Revenue Officer,
Pudukkottai District,
Pudukkottai.
2.The Assistant Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
Pudukkottai District.
3.The Tahsildar,
Kandarvakottai Taluk,
Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside
the order, dated 16.11.2022 passed in W.P(MD)No.18310 of 2022, on the
file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Baalasundharam
For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan
Additional Government Pleader
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)
The appellant has filed the present Writ Appeal challenging the
order, dated 18.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in
W.P(MD)No.18310 of 2022, wherein, the learned Single Judge directed the
first respondent to consider the representation/appeal of the appellant,
dated 05.10.2020, conduct enquiry based on the enquiry notice, dated
22.06.2022, conclude the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and
in accordance with law.
2.Assailing the said order, the appellant has preferred the present
Writ Appeal on the ground that though the appellant has preferred an
appeal before the first respondent to rectify the error in UDR Patta No.907,
pertaining to S.F.No.120 of Kovilore Village, Kandarvakkottai Taluk,
Pudukkottai District and to issue patta to the appellant based on the
registered sale deed, dated 10.12.2004, the Writ Court cannot pass an
order to conduct enquiry, based on the enquiry notice, dated 22.06.2022
and to pass appropriate orders.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the
learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
4.On a perusal of the order passed by the Writ Court, it is seen
that the property in question was classified as “Tharisu” in SLR and the
same was registered in the name of Trustees of Arimlam Vairavan Chettiyar
Annathana Chathiram. Therefore, we do not find any error or irregularity in
the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal
is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed. No costs.
[D.K.K.,J.] & [R.V.,J.]
15.12.2022
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes
ps
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Kandarvakottai Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
D. KRISHNAKUMAR,J.
and
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
ps
ORDER MADE IN W.A(MD)No.1487 of 2022
15.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!