Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18072 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
and
Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.2941 and 2943 of 2020
Muthulakshmi,
: Petitioner
Vs
Balu,
: Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying
this Court to call for the records in S.T.C.No. 08 of 2019, on the file of
learned Judicial Magistrate, Kulithalai and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition had been filed seeking to quash the
charge sheet in S.T.C.No. 08 of 2019, on the file of learned Judicial
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
Magistrate, Kulithalai.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner would submit that since the trial had already been
commenced. It would be suffice, if the trial Court is directed to dispose of the
case within a time stipulated.
3.Considering the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing
for the petitioner and also the fact that the trial in S.T.C.No.08 of 2019 is at
part heard stage, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kulithalai, is directed to
complete the trial in S.T.C.No.08 of 2019 and dispose of the same as
expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three months, from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands
disposed of.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal
appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is ordered to be dispensed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
with, on conditions that she shall appear at the time of initial questioning,
proceedings under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment
and on the hearings, specifically directed by the trial court. The petitioner is
further directed to give an undertaking in the form of affidavit that she will be
duly represented by a counsel on all hearing dates and that the Counsel
representing her will cross examine the prosecution witnesses on the same
day they are examined in chief. The petitioner shall not dispute the identity of
the witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the Court in the event her
presence is insisted by the trial judge for the purpose of identification. If the
petitioner adopts any dilatorial tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist for
her appearance and deal with the petitioner in accordance with the judgment
of Supreme Court of India, in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath
Singh, reported in 2001 (4) SCC 667.
6.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
07.12.2022
Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order lr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Kulithalai.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.
lr
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.5114 of 2020
07.12.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!