Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14709 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
TCA.No.848 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No. 848 of 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant
Versus
T.Vijayakumar
L/R of T.Srichand,
28, BNVV Enclave,
Anna Nagar,
Trichy 620 018. .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A”
Bench, dated 30.01.2015 passed in IT(SS)A No.10/Mds/2014 in respect of
Block Period 1.4.1995 to 31.3.2001 and 1.4.2001 and 13.7.2001.
For Appellant : M/s.M. Swaminathan &
V. Pushpa
Standing Counsel
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.848 of 2015
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 30.01.2015 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench in IT(SS)A
No.10/Mds/2014 relating to Block Period 1.4.1995 to 31.3.2001 and
1.4.2001 and 13.7.2001.
2. On 7.10.2015, this tax case appeal is admitted by this Court on the
following substantial question of law;
' 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessment order passed by the assessing officer under Section 158BD is barred by limitation when there is no time limit for initiation of proceedings under Section 158BD and the assessment order was within the time limit under Section 158BE(2)?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.848 of 2015
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said
to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
22.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-III, Trichy
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12 Tiruchirappalli
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.848 of 2015
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
T.C.A.No. 848 of 2015
22.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!