Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14708 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
TCA.No.112 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
T.C.A.No. 112 of 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai .. Appellant
Versus
Smt.V.P.Safiya,
5/25, 5th Street,
APMS Marakkayar Nagar,
Neelankarai, Chennai 600 041 .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A”
Bench, dated 26.05.2016 passed in ITA.No.565/Mds/2016 in respect of
Assessment Year 2011-12.
For Appellant : Mr.J. Narayanaswamy
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr. R. Sivaraman
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
TCA.No.112 of 2018
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / revenue,
questioning the correctness of the order dated 26.05.2016 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench in
ITA.No.565/Mds/2016 for the Assessment Year 2011-12 on the following
substantial question of law;
' 1.Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the appeal arising out of the assessment order giving effect to the revisions order, had to be set aside, without going into the merits of the case, on the ground that the revision order of the CIT u/s.263, was set aside by the tribunal, even though the appeal arising from the revision order is pending before this Hon'ble Court?”
2. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the
Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct
Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not
exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.112 of 2018
effect in this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
3. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned
counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax
effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as
withdrawn, keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in
an appropriate case. No costs.
[R.M.D,J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
22.08.2022
msr
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Income Tax Officer,
Business Ward-V(1),
Chennai-34.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15 Chennai -34
3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA.No.112 of 2018
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
msr
T.C.A.No. 112 of 2018
22.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!