Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14428 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2022
1 C.S. No.742 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 12.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.S.No.742 of 2013
1. C. Kanagasabapathi, (Deceased)
2. K. Rajathilagam,
3. A. Meenakhi,
4. K. Rajachidambaram, ...Plaintiffs
.Vs.
1.Mrs. C. Janagammal,
2.Mrs. K. Gomathi,
3.Mrs. C. Janaki,
4.Mr. C. Namachivayam,
5.Mr. J. Gopinath,
6.Mr.D. Santhosh Kumar,
7. Mr. T. Jayakumar ...
Defendants
Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order
VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for:
a) Dividing the schedule mentioned property by metes and bounds
of five equal shares and allot 1/5th share to the plaintiff.
Page No.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2 C.S. No.742 of 2013
b) To cancel the consent deed dated 08.10.2012, registered as
document No.11590 of 2012 in Sub-Registrar Office, Guduvancheri,
executed by Plaintiff and 3rd defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant as
invalid.
c) To appoint an advocate commissioner to divide the schedule
mentioned property into five equal parts and allot 1/5th share to the
plaintiff and
d) costs of this suit.
For Plaintiffs : Mr.`K. Ramesh
For Defendants : Mr. A. Ilangovan for D-2
: Mr. B. Sudharshan for D-3
: Mr. M. Stalin for D-4
******
JUDGMENT
The plaintiffs have come up with the above suit seeking for a
directions: a) Dividing the schedule mentioned property by metes and
bounds of five equal shares and allot 1/5th share to the plaintiff b) To
cancel the consent deed dated 08.10.2012, registered as document
Page No.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
No.11590 of 2012 in Sub-Registrar Office, Guduvancheri, executed by
Plaintiff and 3rd defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant as invalid c) to
appoint an advocate commissioner to divide the schedule mentioned
property into five equal parts and allot 1/5th share to the plaintiff and d)
costs of this suit.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today along with TOS
No.16 of 2015, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs in the aforesaid suit
seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this suit and he has also made
an endorsement to that effect.
3.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel
for the plaintiffs, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed if any.
12.08.2022
Lbm
Index : No
Internet : Yes
Speaking order/ Non-speaking order
Page No.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J
Lbm
C.S.No.742 of 2013
12.08.2022
Page No.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!