Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14357 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:11.08.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
1. Ramar
2. Mahalingam ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The Inspector of Police
Thirumangalam Town Police Station
Madurai District
2. Aandi ....Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
praying to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.230 of
2022on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sivaprakash
For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James
No.1 Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
No.2 : Mr.R.Ranjith
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in
230 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the
petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant using filthy language
and also attacked with hands, hence the case came to be registered.
3.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time,
the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute
amicably among themselves.
4.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court
which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and
also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second
respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were
identified by Mr.C.Karunakaran, Spl.SI of Police, Thirumangalam Town
Police Station as well as by the learned Counsels appearing for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
parties. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that
the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
5.In the instant case, the dispute is between the husband and wife
and now the parties had compromised. Where the parties have
compromised the matter, the High Court has power to quash the
complaint for the offence under Sections 341,294(b),323,355,506(i) of
IPC r/w.Section 4 of TNPHW Act.
6.The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in
(2012)10 SCC 303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of
Gujrath) reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.
7.In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments
of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping
the proceedings in Crime No. 230 of 2022 pending before the first
respondent police, even though, the offences involved are not
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
compoundable in nature.
8.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and
as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.230 of 2022 on the file of the
first respondent police respondent police, is quashed insofar as the
petitioners alone and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part
and parcel of this order.
11.08.2022
Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order aav
To
1. The Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Town Police Station Madurai District
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
aav
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14403 of 2022
11.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!