Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14282 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
L.R.Shanthi ...petitioner
Vs.
The Tahsildar,
Ponneri Taluk,
Tiruvallur District. ...respondent
Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the
impugned order passed by the respondent herein in his proceeding
Na.Ka.No.4596/2021/A6, dated 07.02.2022 and quash the same and
consequently direct the respondent to issue legal heirship certificate to
the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja
For Respondent : Mr.T.Seenivasan
Special Government Pleader
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned
order dated 07.02.2022 rejecting the petitioner's application seeking for
issuance of legal heirship certificate for her deceased husband
Mr.B.Ramesh, who died on 18.05.2021.
2. The application submitted by the petitioner has been rejected
on the ground that B.Ramesh is having more than one wife. The
petitioner filed documents along with this Writ Petition to show that the
first wife of the deceased Vijayalakshmi died on 19.10.1999 as seen from
her death certificate. Insofar as the second wife is concerned, the said
marriage got dissolved as seen from the judgment and decree passed in
HMOP.No.17/2005 dated 07.11.2008.
3. The petitioner contends that she married Mr.B.Ramesh on
10.12.2011 and marriage certificate is also filed as a document. Since the
petitioner has married B.Ramesh only after the death of his first wife and
after dissolution of marriage with the second wife, she claims that she is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
entitled for the legal heirship certificate for her deceased husband
B.Ramesh.
4. However, as seen from the impugned order, the documents
that have been produced by the petitioner before this Court as stated
supra have not been considered. But by a non-speaking order, the
petitioner's application has been rejected on the ground that the deceased
B.Ramesh is having more than one wife. Being a non-speaking order and
an order passed by violation of principles of natural justice, the
impugned order passed by the respondent has to be quashed and the
matter be remanded back for fresh consideration on merits and in
accordance with law after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner.
5. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order dated
07.02.2022 is hereby quashed and remanded back to the petitioner for
fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law after affording
a fair hearing to the petitioner including granting her the right of personal
hearing. The respondent is directed to pass final orders within a period of
eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
6. With the above said directions, the Writ Petition is disposed
of. No costs.
10.08.2022
Index : Yes/No
Speaking order : Yes/No
pvs
To
The Tahsildar,
Ponneri Taluk,
Tiruvallur District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
pvs
W.P.No.5859 of 2022
10.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!