Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9169 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022
T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 29.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
T.O.S.No. 15 of 2017
P.Padmanabhan ..Plaintiff
-Vs-
1. P.Jayalakshmi
2. P.Shantha Bai [deceased]
[Amended as per the order
dated 10.07.2019]
3. P.Indirani ..Defendants
This suit has been filed under the Indian Succession Act XXXIX
of 1925 for the grant of Letters of Administration.
For Plaintiff : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan
For Defendants : Mr.A.Kothandaraman
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff has originally filed a petition in O.P.No. 667 of 2012,
for grant of Letters of Administration. Since caveat has been filed, the said
petition was later converted as a suit and was renumbered as T.O.S.No. 15
of 2017.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
2. The case of the plaintiff/petitioner as stated in the Original
Petition is as follows:-
The plaintiff is the son of late Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal and the defendants / respondents are the
daughters and they are the only surviving legal heirs of the said deceased.
The late Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal during her life time
executed a Will dated 30.08.1996 and registered before the Sub Registrar,
Kodambakkam, as Document No.162 of 1996. The Will was attested by
two witnesses, namely, G.Sekar and S.Varadarajan and they are not
related to the testator, namely, Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal.
Subsequent to the said Will, Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal
died on 18.12.2000 at No.9, Sowrashtra Nagar, II Street, Choolaimedu,
Chennai – 94 and she was in good health and in a sound state of mind at
the time when she had executed and registered the Will. The testator was
not subjected to compulsion, coercion, undue influence, threat or force for
executing the Will and the testator did not appoint any person as the
executor of the Will and bequeathed the schedule mentioned properties in
the manner said in the plaint to the plaintiff, who is the son of the testatrix.
The amount of assets likely to come into the plaintiff's hand does not
exceed in aggregate a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- and the net amount of the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
said assets after deducting all items which the plaintiff is by law allowed to
deduct is only to the same value of Rs.29,99,000/-. No application has
been made by the plaintiff before any District Court or Delegate or to any
other High Court for the probate of any Will of the said deceased or Letters
of Administration.
3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff contends that since the
plaintiff is bedridden and cannot even withstand sitting for more than 5
minutes, has taken out an Application No.9245 of 2019 to appoint an
Advocate Commissioner to examine the plaintiff and to record his evidence
in the residence of the plaintiff. Considering the reasons culled out in the
affidavit, the said application was allowed on 09.12.2019. Subsequently, a
report dated 08.02.2020 was filed by the Advocate Commissioner, wherein
it is indicated that the Proof affidavit of the plaintiff (P.W.1) was executed in
the presence of the advocate commissioner and a copy was served on the
learned counsel for the defendants. The Original Will dated 30.08.1996
was marked as Ex.A.1. Ex.A.2 is the Computer generated Death certificate
of Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal. The Original Legal heirs
certificate dated 31.07.2002 of Mrs.Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal was marked as Ex.A.3. Further, the affidavits of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
attesting witnesses, viz., G.Sekar and S.Varadarajan has also been filed,
wherein it is stated that at that point of time, viz., when the will was
executed by the testatrix Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal, she
was in a sound and disposing mind, memory and understanding, therefore,
the plaintiff seeks to grant the Letters of Administration to the plaintiff.
4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the defendants has
filed a consent affidavits of the defendants, viz., P.Jayalakshmi and
P.Indrani indicating that 'at the intervention of the well-wishers, the
defendants settled all the issues amicably among themselves and that they
have no objection to grant probate in respect of the Will dated 30.08.1996
in favour of the plaintiff, as prayed by him'.
5. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the
pleadings, documents and the consent affidavits on record.
6. On scrutinising the documents it is clear that the Will was
executed by Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal, viz., mother of the
plaintiff and the defendants. Even according to the learned counsel for the
plaintiff, the defendants have given their consent affidavits indicating no
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
objection for grant of probate to the plaintiff and the attesting witnesses to
the Will, viz., G.Sekar and S.Varadarajan have also filed their respective
affidavits duly signed by them stating that Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal at the time of executing the Will was in sound and
disposing mind.
7. The defendants, viz., P.Jayalakshmi and P.Indirani, who filed
consent affidavits, appeared in-person before this Court. This Court
verified the identification of the defendants and the contents in the consent
affidavits are read over to the parties and enquired whether the said
consent affidavits are signed by them on their own volition. In reply,
Mrs.Jayalakshmi as well as Mrs.Indrani, stated that in order to give quietus
to the issue they have given the said consent affidavits and contented that
they have no objection for the grant of Letters of Administration to their
brother, viz., plaintiff.
8. That apart, the defendants would also contend that the plaintiff
is in possession of various properties and some other properties, may be
allotted to them, for which, the learned counsels have submitted that the
plaintiff has filed a suit for partition in the other properties against the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
defendants and the same is pending in O.S.No.9137 of 2021 before the
learned XVI Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The learned counsels have
also produced an undertaking given by the plaintiff in the said suit, by way
of a promissory note dated 15.04.2022, wherein it is averred by the plaintiff
that as per the wish of their mother, viz., Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal and another sister, viz., Shantha Bai (deceased),
the following properties are bequeathed to the defendants and their legal
heirs, in which, the plaintiff as well as his legal heirs will not claim any right
or his share whatsoever:
Details of the property:
1. Late Thirupurammal @ Thirupurasundariammal (mother)
No.1, Sourashtra Nagar 1st Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai -94
2. P.Indrani (sister)
No.1/1, Sourashtra Nagar 1st Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai -94
3. Late Shantha Bai (sister)
No.1/2, Sourashtra Nagar 1st street, Choolaimedu, Chennai -94
4. P.Jayalakshmi (sister)
No.1/3, Sourashtra Nagar 1st street, Choolaimedu, Chennai -94
5. Late P.Shantha Bai
No.16/2, Sourashtra Nagar 1st street, Choolaimedu, Chennai -94
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
6. Late P.Shantha Bai
2400 Sq.ft., of land, Peerkankaranai, Perungulathur.
Further, the plaintiff also undertook to withdraw the said suit as well as the
other suits before the courts below, which were pending in respect of the
above said properties.
9. That apart, the plaintiff undertakes to duly administer the
properties and credits of the said Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal, the deceased and in any way concerning her Will
by paying first her debts and then the legatees therein, in so far as the
asset bequeathed to her and to make a full and true inventory thereof and
exhibit the same in this Court within six months from the date of grant of
letters of administration with the Will annexed to the petition and to render
to this Court a true account of the said properties and credits within one
year from the said date.
10. Considering the consent affidavits filed by the defendants,
expressing no objection for the grant of letters of administration to the
plaintiff and the affidavits filed by the attesting witnesses, viz., G.Sekar and
S.Varadarajan, on execution of the Will, which is proved in accordance with
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
law in respect of the Will executed by the deceased Thirupurammal @
Thirupurasundariammal having effect throughout the State of Tamil Nadu,
this Court is of the view that there is no impediment in granting Letters of
Administration in favour of the plaintiff.
In view of the above stated position, this Court is of the view that
the plaintiff is entitled to the grant of Letters of Administration. Accordingly,
the Testamentary Original Suit is ordered and a direction is issued for the
grant of Letters of Administration to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is also
directed to execute a Security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- in favour of
the Assistant Registrar (O.S.II) High Court, Madras. The plaintiff is further
directed to render true and correct accounts once in a year.
29.04.2022
ssd
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.O.S.No.15 of 2017
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.,
ssd
T.O.S.No. 15 of 2017
29.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!