Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8542 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2022
C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
1.Mariammal
2.Muthulakshmi
3.Mareeswaran
4.Lakshmi Ammal ... Appellants/Petitioners
.vs.
1.J.Ramajeyam
2.Reliance General Insurance Company,
3rd Floor, Sri Abirami Towers,
Cowly Brown Road,
R.S.Puram,
Coimbatore ... Respondents/Petitioners
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
against the fair and decreetal order passed in M.C.O.P.No.57 of
2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / II Additional
District Judge, Thoothukudi, dated 06.01.2021.
For Appellant : Mr.Shathurthi Raja, for
M/s.S.Kadarkarai
For R-1 : No Appearance
For R-2 : Mr.V.Sakthivel
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
JUDGMENT
*********
R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.
The claimants in M.C.O.P.No.57 of 2018 on the file of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / II Additional District Judge,
Thoothukudi, are on appeal, challenging the rejection of their claim
petition on the ground that the involvement of the vehicle owned by
the first respondent and insured with the second repsondent
Insurance Company, has not been established to the satisfaction of
the Court.
2. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant has produced
documents in the form of charge sheet, 161 Cr.P.C., statements and
deposition in C.C.No.217 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi, wherein the driver of the offending
Car bearing Registration No.TN 69 BD 0120 was charged with the
offence of rash and negligent driving. According to the learned
counsel, these documents offer sufficient proof for the involvement
of the Car owned by the first respondent in the accident.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
3. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent /
Insurance Company, would submit that he should be given an
opportunity to let in evidence before the Tribunal in view of the
subsequent revelation.
4. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. The
order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / II Additional District
Judge, Thoothukudi, dated 06.01.2021, dismissing
M.C.O.P.No.57 of 2018, is set aside and M.C.O.P.57 of 2018, is
remitted to the Tribunal to be disposed of in accordance with law.
The parties will at liberty to let in oral and documentary evidence.
Considering the fact that the accident is of the year 2017, the
Tribunal will endeavour to dispose of the M.C.O.P.57 of 2018, within
six months from the date of receipt of copy of the papers from this
Court. No Costs.
[R.S.M.,J.] [N.S.K.,J.]
22.04.2022
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
pm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
To:
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ II Additional District Judge, Thoothukudi.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.
pm
JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.927 of 2021
22.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!