Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8524 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2022
Crl.OP.No.9208 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :22.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.9208 of 2022
R.Rajkumar
Secretary
The Madras Flying Club Ltd.,
IOSA Auditor
ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor
Chennai Airport, Chennai 600027
Residing at
M14/20, Navabharath Colony,
2nd Street, Besant Nagar,
Chennai 600090. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery,
Chennai 600 005.
2.The Joint Commissioner of Police (South)
St. Thomas Mount Range,
Chennai 600 016.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
St.Thomas Mount Range,
Chennai 600 016.
4.The Inspector of Police,
S2, Airport Police Station,
Chennai 600 027. ...Respondents
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.9208 of 2022
PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to take the
appropriate Action under IPC against the accused as submitted in the
Affidavit bearing the Complaint No.248/COP/PG/2017 &
498/ADDLCOP/S/HO/2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajkumar, Party-in-Person
For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a
direction to the respondent to take the appropriate Action under IPC
against the accused as submitted in the Affidavit bearing the Complaint
No.248/COP/PG/2017 & 498/ADDLCOP/S/HO/2017.
2. Heard the party-in-person and the learned Additional
Government Pleader and perused the materials available on record.
3. This petition is not maintainable, in view of the Order passed by
a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.9208 of 2022
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three
Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC
464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that
the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in
exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail the
alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and
Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. Liberty is given to the party-in-person to
workout his remedy as per the directions issued by the Hon'ble Division
Bench in the order referred supra by filing appropriate petition under
Section 156(3) before the jurisdictional Court.
4. This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.
22.04.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order
shk/sai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.9208 of 2022
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA. J,.
shk To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai 600 005.
2.The Joint Commissioner of Police (South) St.Thomas Mount Range, Chennai 600 016.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount Range, Chennai 600 016.
4.The Inspector of Police, S2, Airport Police Station, Chennai 600 027.
5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.9208 of 2022
22.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!