Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Balammal vs N.Vineshkumar
2021 Latest Caselaw 18038 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18038 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2021

Madras High Court
V.Balammal vs N.Vineshkumar on 3 September, 2021
                                                                                   C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 03.09.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021


                     1.V.Balammal

                     2.C.V.Varadharaj                                      ...     Appellants

                                                         Versus

                     1. N.Vineshkumar

                     2. K.Balu

                     3.The Manager,
                     National Insurance Company Limited,
                     No.1, Marumalarchi Shopping Complex,
                     R.Pudupatti Post, Rasipuram Taluk,
                     Namakkal District.                                    ...     Respondents


                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor

                     Vehicles Act, 1988 to allow the present appeal award enhanced

                     compensation        in   judgment    and     decree   dated    30.03.2021       in

                     M.C.O.P.No.131/2018 on the file of the Motor accident Claims Tribunal

                     (Sub Judge), Rasipuram as prayed for in this appeal with cost.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/8
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

                                       For Appellants        : Mrs.V.Revathi
                                       For Respondents       : Mr.J.Chandran for R3

                                                     JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed by the appellants/claimants seeking

enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated

30.03.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Sub Judge),

Rasipuram in M.C.O.P. No.131 of 2018.

2. The appellants / claimants who are the parents of the deceased

who died as a result of an accident caused by a vehicle insured with the

3rd respondent / Insurance Company and they preferred a claim before

the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Sub Judge), Rasipuram in

M.C.O.P. No.131 of 2018 seeking compensation for the death of their

son.

3. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the impugned award

directed the 3rd respondent / Insurance Company to pay the appellants /

claimants a compensation of Rs.10,83,000/-, as detailed hereunder :

                                             Heads             Amount awarded
                                                                by the Tribunal
                                                                     (Rs.)
                                   For Pecuniary Loss                 10,08,000/-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

Heads Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.) For Funeral Expenses 15,000/-

                                   For Consortium                          40,000/-
                                   For Loss of Estate                      15,000/-
                                   For Transportation                       5,000/-
                                 Total                               10,83,000/-

4. The appellants / claimants unsatisfied with the quantum of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the impugned award has

preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement.

5. Heard Mrs.V.Revathi, learned counsel for the appellants and

Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel for the third respondent / Insurance

Company.

6. This Court has perused the materials and evidence available on

record before the Tribunal.

7. The deceased was a Sago Factory Labourer, aged 38 years at the

time of accident which happened on 18.04.2018. The cause of the

accident, age and avocation of the deceased has not been disputed by the

respondents as seen from the evidence available on record. In the claim https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

petition, the appellants/claimants had pleaded that the deceased was

earning Rs.15,000/- per month. However, the Tribunal under the

impugned award has fixed the notional monthly income of the deceased

at Rs.8,000/- which in the considered view of this Court is low. If the

age, avocation and year of the accident was taken into consideration, the

Tribunal ought to have fixed the monthly income of the deceased at a

higher sum. This Court after giving due consideration to the age,

avocation and year of the accident which happened in the year 2018 fixed

the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.12,000/- instead of

Rs.8,000/-, erroneously fixed by the Tribunal.

8. However, the Tribunal has rightly awarded 40% towards loss of

future prospects to the appellants/claimants, in accordance with decision

of the Supreme Court of India in National Insurance Co. vs Pranay

sethi and others reported in 2017 (16) SCC 680. Since the notional

monthly income of the deceased is increased to Rs.12,000/- by this

Court, the pecuniary loss payable to the appellants/claimants is

re-assessed by this Court at Rs.15,12,000/- instead of Rs.10,83,000/-

fixed by the Tribunal under the impugned award. The Tribunal also

rightly deducted 50% towards personal expenses of the deceased, as the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

deceased was a bachelor at the time of the accident. With regard to the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal under various other heads namely

Funeral Expenses for Rs.15,000/-, Consortium for Rs.40,000/-, Loss of

Estate for Rs.15,000/- and Transportation for Rs,5,000/- are concerned,

the same cannot be considered to be inadequate and therefore, the same

is confirmed by this Court.

9. The deceased was not wearing helmet at the time of the accident

and therefore, the Tribunal has fixed 15% contributory negligence on the

part of the deceased under the impugned award. This Court does not find

any infirmity with the said finding. Accordingly, the fixation of

contributory negligence at 15% on the part of the deceased is confirmed

by this Court.

10. For the foregoing reasons, the award of the Tribunal is hereby

modified in the following manner :

                                       Heads             Amount awarded Amount awarded
                                                          by the Tribunal by this Court
                                                               (Rs.)          (Rs.)
                           For Pecuniary Loss                   10,08,000/-         15,12,000/-
                           For Funeral Expenses                    15,000/-             15,000/-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

Heads Amount awarded Amount awarded by the Tribunal by this Court (Rs.) (Rs.) For Consortium 40,000/- 40,000/-

                           For Loss of Estate                          15,000/-            15,000/-
                           For Transportation                           5,000/-              5,000/-
                           Total                                  10,83,000/-          15,87,000/-


11. Since 15% contributory negligence is fixed on the part of the

deceased, the compensation payable to the appellants/claimants is

Rs.13,48,950/- (Rs.15,87,000/- - Rs.2,38,050/- (towards 15%

contributory negligence).

12. In the result, the appeal filed by the appellants / claimants,

stands partly allowed by enhancing the compensation from

Rs.10,83,000/- to Rs.13,48,950/- as indicated above. No costs.

13. The third respondent / Insurance Company is directed to

deposit the entire award amount as assessed by this Court together with

interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of

realization, less the amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of

M.C.O.P. No.131 of 2018 on the file of the Motor accident Claims

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

Tribunal, Sub Judge, Rasipuram, within a period of four weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made,

the Tribunal is directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank

account of the appellants / claimants, through RTGS, within a period of

two weeks thereafter. The requisite Court fee, if any has to be paid by the

appellants/claimants before receiving the copy of this Judgment.

03.09.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

ssn

To

1. The Sub Judge, Motor accident Claims Tribunal, Rasipuram.

2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai – 104.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

ssn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

C.M.A.No.2315 of 2021

03.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter