Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

I.Muthu @ Siluvainathan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2021 Latest Caselaw 17992 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17992 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021

Madras High Court
I.Muthu @ Siluvainathan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 2 September, 2021
                                                                                     W.P.No.18370 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 02.09.2021

                                                              CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                                     W.P.No.18370 of 2021

                                               (Through Video Conferencing)

                     I.Muthu @ Siluvainathan                                  ... Petitioner

                                                                Vs

                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep by it Secretary to Government,
                       Environment and Forest Department,
                       Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

                     2.The Pirncipal Chief Conservator of Forest,
                       Panagal Building, Saidapet,
                       Chennai – 15.

                     3.The District Forest Officer,
                       Athur Forestry Division, Athur.                        ... Respondents

                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to appoint petitioner
                     as regular time scale Forest Watchers taking into account of petitioner
                     seniority, on par with my juniors with effect from 24.01.1995 for the
                     purpose         of   getting   pension    by    implementing   order    made     in
                     W.P.No.22768 of 2014 dated 22.08.2014 with all consequential benefits.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/5
                                                                                 W.P.No.18370 of 2021




                                     For Petitioner     : Mr.K.Jenitha
                                     For Respondents    : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal
                                                          Government Advocate

                                                     ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Advocate for the respondents.

2.It is noticed that a similar Writ Petitions were filed by

P.Sundaram and P.Govindan and 23 others in W.P.No.15561 of 2006 and

W.P.No.23374 of 2008 which were disposed by orders dated 10.03.2008

and 30.10.2009 respectively with a direction to consider their claim for

appointment as a Forest Watchers on par with their juniors.

3.Further appeals against the aforesaid orders were also dismissed

by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in its Judgment dated

13.10.2009 & 29.03.2010 in W.A.No.690 of 2008 and W.A.No.607 of

2010 repectively.

4.The petitioner had filed W.P.No.22768 of 2014 which came to

be disposed along with a batch of other writ petitions in W.P.Nos.22762

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.18370 of 2021

to 22769 of 2014 vide order dated 22.08.2014. In paragraph 5 it was

held as under:-

5.Considering the fact that the petitioner' juniors were already regularised, even before the petitioners could get regularised, as per the decision referred to above, it is appropriate to direct the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioners on par with their juniors as Forest Watches, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners are entitled to only regularisation from the date on which, the juniors were regularised and they are not entitled to any monetary benefits from that date.

5.Though order has been passed as early as 22.08.2014, the

petitioner has not been appointed as a regular Forest Watcher while some

of his contemporaries and juniors have already been appointed and

promoted as Forest Guards. The petitioner has also sent serveral

representations which has not evoked any positive response from the

respondents.

6.Considering the fact, that already an order has been passed by

this Court in writ petitions filed by the petitioner and others, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.18370 of 2021

respondents have to comply with the same in absence of an order

reversing the same.

7.Therefore, this writ petition is disposed by directing the

respondent to implement the order dated 22.08.2014 in the writ petition

filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

02.09.2021 (1/2) Index: Yes/ No Internet : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order jas To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Environment and Forest Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 15.

3.The District Forest Officer, Athur Forestry Division, Athur.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P.No.18370 of 2021

C.SARAVANAN,J.

jas

W.P.No.18370 of 2021

02.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter