Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17871 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021
S.A.No.449 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.A.No.449 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
T.R.Jothiram ... Appellant
Vs.
1. K.S.Jayagopal
2. The Internal Audit Officer,
O/o, Board Office, Audit Branch,
N.P.K.R.R. Mallgal, 1st Floor,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
3. The Superintending Engineer,
O/o. General Construction Circle,
K.N.Colony Udayapatty, Tamil Nadu,
Electricity Board, Salem – 636 014. ... Respondents
PRAYER: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.67 of 2010 on the file of the
Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Salem, dated 15.02.2012
in partly modifying the judgment and decree in O.S.No.302 of 2007 on the file
of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Salem, dated 31.03.2010.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.449 of 2015
For Appellant : Ms.R.Sripriya
for M/s.V.Raghavachari
-----
JUDGMENT
The present Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and
decree in A.S.No.67 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Court-cum-
Fast Track Court No.1, Salem, dated 15.02.2012 in partly modifying the
judgment and decree in O.S.No.302 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional
Subordinate Court, Salem, dated 31.03.2010.
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties
before the Execution Court. In support of her submission, she produced a Memo
of Affirmation filed by the respondent, wherein it is stated that the plaintiff had
received the entire payment from the defendants on the basis of the promissory
note and had withdrawn R.E.P.No.109 of 2012 and further, undertaken that he
will not pursue the dispute. The said Memo was received by the Execution
Court and the Execution Petition was dismissed as not pressed on 16.06.2017.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.449 of 2015
3. Taking the Memo dated 25.08.2021 filed on behalf of the appellant
on record, the Second Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Further, it is submitted that the defendants deposited the decree amount before
the Execution Court. It is made clear that the appellant is entitled to withdraw
the decree amount by filing an appropriate application before the Execution
Court. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
01.09.2021 asi
To
1. The Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Salem.
2. The I Additional Subordinate Court, Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.449 of 2015
M. GOVINDARAJ, J.
asi
S.A.No.449 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
01.09.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!