Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21770 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021
C.R.P. NPD No.2614 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
C.R.P.NPD No.2614 of 2019
and
C.M.P. No. 17279 of 2019 &16901 of 2021
Venkatesan,
S/o. O.K.Sivaraman ... Petitioner
Versus
T.M.Arumugam,
S/o. Muthusamy ... Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Sec.25(1) of Tamil Nadu
Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, praying to set aside the order
made in judgment and decree dated 01.03.2019 in R.C.A.No.1 of 2018
passed by the Sub-Court, Omalur, Salem District (Rent Control Appellate
Authority) confirming R.C.O.P.No. 2 of 2014 dated 27.07.2015 passed by
the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Omalur (Rent Controller) and
set aside the same.
1/5
C.R.P. NPD No.2614 of 2019
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference)
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the
order passed in R.C.A.No.1 of 2018 passed by the Sub-Court, Omalur,
Salem District (Rent Control Appellate Authority) confirming the order
passed in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2014, dated 27.07.2015 by District Munsif cum
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur (Rent Controller).
2. The Revision Petitioner is the tenant, against whom, a petition in
R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2014 was filed by the respondent/landlord for eviction on
the ground of Sec.10(2)(i), 10(3) and 14(1)(b) of Tamil Nadu Builidngs
(Lease and Rent Control) Act. The said R.C.O.P. was contested by the
tenant. On hearing both sides, the learned Rent Controller has allowed the
petition in favour of landlord and one month time was granted to vacate the
premises. Against which, an appeal R.C.A.No.1 of 2018 was filed by the
petitioner/tenant on the file of Rent Control Appellate authority (Sub-
C.R.P. NPD No.2614 of 2019
Judge), Omalur. The said appeal was also contested by the landlord. On
hearing both sides, the Rent Control Appellate Authority has also dismissed
the appeal.
3. Considering the fact that the property is required for own occupation
for the landlord with the bonafide intention and also observed that the
tenant has not paid the rent regularly and committed willful default. Further,
at the time of passing of order, the landlord was aged about 82 years and the
reason for his own purpose is bonafide one. Accordingly, R.C.A. was
dismissed. Aggrieved that order, he has preferred this Revision Petition. At
the time of enquiry, it was stated that there is arrears of rent and the revision
petitioner has not taken any steps to deposit the rent inspite of the order
passed in the R.C.O.P. proceedings. When the respondent has committed
default, both the courts below have factually and legally considered the
facts and dismissed the R.C.O.P. as well as R.C.A. filed by the Revision
Petitioner, which requires no interference of this court. Accordingly, this
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as no merits. However, the Revision
Petitioner is directed to vacate the premises within a period of two months
C.R.P. NPD No.2614 of 2019
from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the
connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
29.10.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rpp
To
1. Sub-Judge, Sub-Court, (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Omalur, Salem.
2. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, (Rent Controller), Omalur, Salem.
C.R.P. NPD No.2614 of 2019
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.R.P.NPD No.2614 of 2019
29.10.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!