Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sundarammal vs D.Ravikumar
2021 Latest Caselaw 21496 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21496 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Sundarammal vs D.Ravikumar on 27 October, 2021
                                                          C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                              DATED: 27.10.2021

                                  CORAM:

       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                         C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

1. K.Sundarammal
2. K.Chenrayan
3. B.Padvattu
4. K.Pandian
5. K.Ramamoorthy
6. K.Indira                                            .. Appellants
                                     Vs.

1. D.Ravikumar

2. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.,
   No.45 & 46, Whites Road
   Chennai - 600 014.                                  .. Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated
24.06.2014, made in M.C.O.P.No.2253 of 2009, on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I (dealing with MCOP cases),
Chennai.


             For Appellants          : Mr.C.Munusamy

             For Respondent 2        : Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan
                                   -----


1/7
                                                           C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

                                JUDGMENT

(The case has been heard through video conference)

This appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of

compensation under the impugned Award dated 24.06.2014, passed by the

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I (dealing with MCOP

cases), Chennai, in M.C.O.P.No.2253 of 2009.

2. The appellants/claimants not satisfied with the quantum of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal has preferred this appeal seeking for

enhancement. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal

under the impugned Award are as follows:

      Sl.No.                        Heads                 Amount in Rs.
        1.     Loss of dependency                                3,36,000
        2.     Love and Affection                                   30,000
        3.     Funeral expenses                                     15,000
               Total                                             3,81,000




3. The deceased was a Managing Partner at M/s.S.K.Digital Video and

was aged 24 years at the time of the accident, which was caused by a vehicle

insured with the second respondent on 22.11.2008. In the claim petition, the

appellants/claimants who are his dependents have pleaded that he was

earning Rs.30,000/- per month at the time of the accident, however since no

documentary evidence has been produced by the appellants/claimants before

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

the Tribunal, the notional monthly income of the deceased was fixed at

Rs.7,000/- which includes future prospects. The accident happened in the

year 2008, therefore the assessment of notional monthly income of the

deceased made by the Tribunal cannot be considered to be inadequate and it

is a just assessment. However, the Tribunal while assessing the loss of

dependency has erroneously adopted wrong multiplier of 8 by erroneously

considering the age of the mother of the deceased instead of considering the

age of the deceased. The deceased was aged 24 years at the time of the

accident and therefore the Tribunal ought to have adopted 18 multiplier

instead of 8 erroneously adopted by it. Accordingly, the multiplier is

modified by this Court to 18. The Tribunal has deducted 50% towards

personal expenses of the deceased as the deceased was a bachelor at the time

of the accident. Since the multiplier to be adopted is 18, loss of dependency

is reassessed by this Court at Rs.7,56,000 (Rs.7,000/- x 1/2 x 12 x 18)

instead of Rs.3,36,000/- (Rs.7000/- x 1/2 x 12 x 8) erroneously fixed by the

Tribunal.

4. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.30,000/- towards love and

affection to the first appellant / first claimant who is the mother of the

deceased instead of Rs.40,000/- which ought to have been awarded to her as

per the settled law. Accordingly, this Court enhances the compensation

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

towards love and affection to Rs.40,000/- instead of Rs.30,000/- erroneously

fixed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has awarded compensation of

Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses which is a correct assessment and the

same is confirmed by this Court. However, the Tribunal has failed to award

any compensation towards loss of estate, which the appellants/claimants are

legally entitled to as per the settled law. In accordance with the settled law,

this Court fixes the compensation towards loss of estate at Rs.15,000/-.

5. For the foregoing reasons, the compensation awarded by the

Tribunal under the impugned Award is enhanced to Rs.8,26,000/- instead of

Rs.3,81,000/- erroneously fixed by the Tribunal. The details of the

compensation now awarded by this Court is detailed hereunder:

Sl.           Description           Amount         Amount        Award confirmed
No.                                awarded by    awarded by     or enhanced or set
                                  the Tribunal   this Court     aside or granted or
                                      (Rs.)         (Rs.)             reduced
                                                                        (Rs.)
 1. Loss of dependency                3,36,000       7,56,000       Enhanced
 2. Love and Affection                 30,000         40,000        Enhanced
 3. Funeral expenses                   15,000         15,000        Confirmed
 4. Loss of estate                       ---          15,000         Awarded
                                                                   Enhanced by
                 Total                3,81,000      8,26,000
                                                                   Rs.4,45,000/-

6. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed and

the compensation of Rs.3,81,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is hereby

enhanced to Rs.8,26,000/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit. As regards

apportionment of compensation amount, the findings of the Tribunal

directing the second respondent insurance company to pay the entire

compensation amount to the first appellant / first claimant is concerned, the

same is confirmed by this Court. The second respondent / insurance

company is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount now determined

by this Court along with interest and costs, less the amount already

deposited, if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.2253 of 2009, on the file

of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I (dealing with

MCOP cases), Chennai. On such deposit, the first appellant/first claimant is

permitted to withdraw the award amount now determined by this Court,

along with interest and costs, less the amount, if any, already withdrawn by

making necessary application before the Tribunal. The appellants/claimants

are directed to pay necessary Court fee, if any, on the enhanced

compensation now determined by this Court. No costs.

27.10.2021 Index : Yes / No kk

To

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

1. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge I (dealing with MCOP cases), Chennai.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

kk

C.M.A.No.3254 of 2014

27.10.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter