Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries ... vs Salud Care (I) Pvt Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 21021 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21021 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021

Madras High Court
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries ... vs Salud Care (I) Pvt Ltd on 21 October, 2021
                                                                                 C.S.No.190 of 2011

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 21.10.2021

                                                       CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                                  C.S.No.190 of 2011

                     Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
                     CD Plot No.3, Door No.8,
                     Old Tower Block Street,
                     Nandhanam Extension,
                     Chennai – 600 035,
                     rep. by its Constituted Attorney
                     K.Murugesan                                                    ...Plaintiff
                                                      .Vs.
                     Salud Care (I) Pvt Ltd.,
                     172-B, Manicktala Main Road,
                     Kolkatta – 700 054.                                           ... Defendant



                               Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules and
                     Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Sections 27,
                     28, 29, 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 praying for a judgment
                     and decree against the defendant as follows:


                               a) A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     distributors, stockists, servants, agents, retailers, legal representatives or
                     any other person claiming under it from in any manner manufacturing,


                     Page No.1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 C.S.No.190 of 2011

                     selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising directly or indirectly
                     dealing in medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations infringing
                     plaintiff's registered trademark CABGOLIN by use of deceptively similar
                     trademark GOLIN or any mark deceptively similar to plaintiff's
                     registered trademark CABGOLIN or in any other manner whatsoever;


                               b) A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     distributors, stockists, servants, agents, retailers, legal representatives or
                     any other person claiming under it from in any manner manufacturing,
                     selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising directly or indirectly
                     dealing in medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations under the
                     trademark GOLIN or any other trademark that is identical and/ or
                     deceptively similar as that of the plaintiff's registered trademark
                     CABGOLIN and/ or use similar packaging as that of the plaintiff's
                     products under the mark CABGOLIN so as to pass off the defendant's
                     medicinal preparations as and for the medicinal preparations of the
                     plaintiff and/ or in any other manner whatsoever connected with the
                     plaintiff;


                               c) The defendant be ordered to pay to the plaintiff a sum of
                     Rs.1,00,000/- as liquidated damages for committing acts of infringement
                     against plaintiff's registered trademark so as to pass off its products as
                     and for the plaintiff's products;




                     Page No.2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 C.S.No.190 of 2011



                               d) The defendant be ordered and decreed to deliver up for
                     destruction to the plaintiff all the preparations, dies, blocks, labels,
                     packaging either filled or empty, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets, hand
                     bills, hoardings, wall posters, calendars, carry bags, stationery items and
                     such other sales promotional materials bearing and/ or containing the
                     impugned trademark GOLIN;


                               e) A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff
                     directing the defendant to render accounts of profits made by it by use of
                     the trademarks GOLIN which is identical and/ or deceptively similar and
                     a final decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff for the amount of
                     profits found to have been made by the defendant after the latter has
                     rendered accounts and


                               f) for costs of the entire proceedings.


                                     For Plaintiff        : Mr.Keerthi Kiran
                                                           for Mr.A.A.Mohan

                                     For Defendant        : Mr.Biswajit Sarkar


                                                         ********




                     Page No.3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 C.S.No.190 of 2011


                                                    JUDGMENT

Heard Mr.Keerthi Kiran, learned counsel appearing for the

plaintiff and Mr.Biswajit Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the

defendant.

2. The defendant had sent an E-mail to the counsel for the plaintiff

on 8th September 2021 and the contents of the E-mail is as follows:-

“This Trademark is not being used now by us. The Trademark “GOLIN” has not been in operation since the time you have opposed. We have stopped selling this medicine under pharmaceutical formulations.” The counsel for the plaintiff would submit that the suit may be

dismissed, recording the said E-mail, as withdrawn.

3. The suit is therefore dismissed as withdrawn of course with

liberty to move in case there is a future cause of action. No costs.


                                                                                       21.10.2021
                     dsa
                     Index      : No
                     Internet   : Yes
                     Non-speaking order

                     Page No.4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.190 of 2011

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendant: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendant: Nil

21.10.2021 dsa

Page No.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.190 of 2011

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.190 of 2011

21.10.2021

Page No.6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter