Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Chinnammal vs The Superintendent Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 20945 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20945 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021

Madras High Court
S.Chinnammal vs The Superintendent Of Police on 20 October, 2021
                                                           Crl.O.P.No.18572 of 2021


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                             DATED : 20.10.2021

                                  CORAM:

                 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                           Crl.O.P.No.18572 of 2021

S.Chinnammal                                               ... Petitioner

                                      Versus

1.The Superintendent of Police,
  Namakkal District.

2.The Inspector of Police,
  Pudhuchatram Police Station,
  Namakkal District.                                       ... Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to register the
complaint of the petitioner dated 12.08.2021.
                  For Petitioner  :       Mr.R.Nalliyappan
                  For Respondents :       Mr.R.Vinothraja,
                                          Government Advocate (crl.side)

                                      *****

                                      ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents Police to

Crl.O.P.No.18572 of 2021

register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 12.08.2021.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3.This petition is not maintainable, in view of the Order passed by

a Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The Superintendent

of Police, Thanjavur reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489. The Hon'ble

Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench

in M. Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after

relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court

cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its

jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon'ble Supreme Court

held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy

provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to workout his remedy as per the

directions issued by the Division Bench in the order referred supra.

Crl.O.P.No.18572 of 2021

4.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

20.10.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

mrp

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pudhuchatram Police Station, Namakkal District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.18572 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

mrp

CRL.O.P.No.18572 of 2021

20.10.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter