Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20899 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021
C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.M.A. No. 1157 of 2016 and
C.M.P. No. 14496 of 2016
M/s. Dolphine Chemicals,
Represented by its Proprietor
Mr.G.Ravichandran.
... Appellant
Vs
M/s. ACSA Chimica Sri,
At VIA Pasteur, 3, Sedriano (Milan) Italy – 20018.
Represented by it Authorized Power Agent
Mr. Vadivel Saravanan. ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of Civil
Procedure Code, 1908, to set aside the Order and Decreetal Order passed in
I.A. No. 143 of 2015 in O.S. No.2479 of 2013 dated 22.03.2016 by the
learned XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr. V. R. Appaswamee
For Respondent : No Appearance
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed by the defendant in the suit O.S. No.
2479 of 2013 on the file of the XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The suit was filed by the respondent against the
appellant/defendant, seeking for recovery of a sum of Rs.19,43,673/-
(Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Forty Three Thousand Six Hundred and Seventy
Three only) for the value of the supplies together with interest and costs.
The said suit came to be decreed exparte by the trial court on 16.06.2013.
Aggrieved by the same, the Appellant/defendant filed an interlocutory
application I.A.No.143 of 2015 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the
exparte decree dated 16.06.2013. By order dated 22.03.2016, the learned
XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai has dismissed the application I.A.
No. 143 of 2015 in O.S. No. 2479 of 2013. Aggrieved by the same, this
appeal has been filed by the Appellant/defendant.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
3. The trial court while dismissing the application I.A. No.143
of 2015 filed by the appellant/defendant has given the following reasons:
a) The trial court while decreeing the suit exparte in
favour of the respondent against the appellant has
framed the points for consideration and only after
detailed discussion has decreed the suit.
b) The appellant/defendant has been watching the
proceedings and only after filing of two transmit
execution petitions by the respondent/plaintiff has
filed I.A. No.143 of 2015 under Order 9 Rule 13
CPC seeking to set aside the exparte decree.
c) The appellant/defendant has not filed any
medical certificate to prove the illness of the wife
of the appellant Mr. G. Ravichandran.
d) The appellant/defendant has approached the
Court with unclean hands.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
4. Heard Mr.V.R.Appaswamee, learned counsel for the
Appellant. There is no representation on the side of the respondent, though
the respondent has been duly served and the name of the respondent is also
printed in the cause list today.
5. Admittedly, the application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC
in I.A. No. 143 of 2015 has been filed within the prescribed period and there
is no delay. However, being a money decree, the appellant/defendant should
be put on terms, since admittedly, the execution petitions have been filed by
the respondent/plaintiff to execute the exparte decree dated 16.06.2013,
passed in their favour. Further, the application filed under Order 9 Rule 13
CPC by the appellant has been accompanied with the written statement of
the appellant/plaintiff. The trial court ought to have considered all these
factors and ought to have allowed the application on terms instead of
dismissing the same.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
6. This Court is of the considered view that the
appellant/defendant will have to be put on terms for allowing this appeal,
since the decree obtained by the respondent is a money decree and the said
decree has been obtained for the alleged value of the supplies made by the
defendant to the plaintiff.
7. After giving due consideration to the aforementioned factors,
this Court is inclined to allow this appeal, subject to the condition that the
appellant/defendant deposits a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs
only) to the credit of the suit O.S. No. 2479 of 2013 within a period of six
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
8. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed on condition that the
appellant deposits a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) to the
credit of O.S. No. 2479 of 2013 on the file of the XV Additional City Civil
Court, Chennai within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this Judgment, failing which, the appeal shall stand automatically
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
dismissed. No Costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
20.10.2021 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No rgi/nl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
To
1. XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras - 104.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.1157 of 2016
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.,J rgi
C.M.A. No. 1157 of 2016 and C.M.P. No. 14496 of 2016
20.10.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!