Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Udhayakumar vs The State Represented By
2021 Latest Caselaw 20817 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20817 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Madras High Court
Udhayakumar vs The State Represented By on 8 October, 2021
                                                                                    Crl.A.No.472 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 08.10.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                            Criminal Appeal No.472 of 2021


                   Udhayakumar                                                  ... Appellant
                                                         Versus

                   1.The State represented by,
                     Inspector of Police,
                     Ranipet, AWPS
                     Crime No.11/2021.

                   2. M.Malathi                                                 ... Respondents

                             Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14 A (2) of the SC/ST (Prevention
                   of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1/2016 to call for the records
                   pertaining to the order dated 28.09.2021 in Cr.M.P.No.296/2021 on the file of
                   the Learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST
                   (POA), Act, Vellore and to set aside the same and consequently enlarge the
                   appellant on bail in Crime No.11/2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police,
                   All Women Police Station, Ranipet District.


                                    For Appellant    :     Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan
                                    For Respondent   :     Mr.S.Sugendran
                                                           Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
                                                           for R1

                   Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                    Crl.A.No.472 of 2021


                                                   JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal has been filed against order dated 28.09.2021 in

Cr.M.P.No.296 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special

Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA), Act, Vellore.

2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant/2nd

respondent herein is that the appellant on the promise of marrying her had

sexual intercourse with her several times. Thereafter, when she insisted the

appellant to marry her, the appellant along with the other accused abused her

by uttering her caste name and thereby, cheated the de facto complainant and

spoiled her entire life. Hence, the de facto complainant filed a complaint

against the appellant.

3.The respondent police registered a case in Crime No.11 of 2021

initially for the offence punishable under Sections 417 read with Sections

3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 and later altered

into Sections 417, 376 IPC read with Sections 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(r),

3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 and he is in custody from

10.08.2021. During the pendency of the investigation, the appellant along

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.A.No.472 of 2021

with other accused filed a petition before the Designated Court in

Crl.M.P.No.254 of 2021 seeking bail. By an order dated 10.08.2021, the

Designated Court granted bail in favour other accused and dismissed as

against the appellant herein. Aggrieved over the same, the appellant preferred

an appeal in Crl.A.No.388 of 2021 before this Court and the same was

dismissed on 25.08.2021. Thereafter, the appellant filed Crl.M.P.No.296 of

2021 before the Designated Court seeking bail and the same was dismissed

on 28.09.2021. Challenging the said order, the appellant has come forward

with the present appeal.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and also perused the

materials available on record.

5. It is seen from the records and the submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side, this Court finds that the appellant is a prime accused

and there is specific overt act attributed against him and investigation is

pending and charge sheet not yet filed. This Court has already dismissed the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.A.No.472 of 2021

earlier appeal in Crl.A.No.388 of 2021 on 25.08.2021 and there is no change

of circumstances in the present appeal.

6..Considering the serious nature of the offence, this Court does not

find any perversity in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special

Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA), Act, Vellore. Accordingly, this

Criminal Appeal is dismissed.

08.10.2021 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order ms

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.A.No.472 of 2021

To

1.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA), Act, Vellore.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4.The Inspector of Police, Ranipet All Women Police Station, Vellore.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.A.No.472 of 2021

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

ms

Crl.A.No.472 of 2021

08.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter