Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Raghavan
2021 Latest Caselaw 20773 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20773 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Raghavan on 8 October, 2021
                                                                            CMA.No.2914 of 2021

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 08.10.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                  C.M.A.No. 2914 of 2021
                                                           and
                                                  C.M.P. No.16694 of 2021

                     The Managing Director,
                     Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.,
                     Kumbakonam                                              ...Appellant
                                               Vs.
                     Raghavan                                                ...Respondent

                                   Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree dated 12.03.2021
                     made in M.C.O.P. No.420 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident
                     Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge, Cuddalore.

                                             For Appellant : Mr. L. Ramanathan

                                                        JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant Transport Corporation

challenging the impugned award dated 12.03.2021 passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge, Cuddalore in M.C.O.P.

No.420 of 2016.

2. The Appellant Transport Corporation has challenged the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.2914 of 2021

impugned award only on the ground that the quantum of compensation

awarded by the Tribunal is excessive. According to them, the Tribunal

ought not to have adopted the multiplier method for assessing the

compensation in favour of the respondent.

3. The Tribunal under the impugned award has directed the

Appellant Transport Corporation to pay the respondent who sustained

injuries on 24.11.2015 as a result of an accident caused by a bus owned

by the Appellant Transport Corporation as detailed hereunder:

                                              Heads             Amount awarded
                                                                 by the Tribunal
                                                                      (Rs.)
                                   Loss of income                         8,31,600
                                   Pain and sufferings                      75,000
                                   Medical expenses                         50,000
                                   Transportation                           50,000
                                   Extra nourishment                        30,000
                                Total                               10,36,600

4. Heard Mr.L.Ramanathan, learned counsel for the appellant /

Transport Corporation and perused and examined the impugned award

before the Tribunal.

5. The respondent sustained the following injuries as a result of an

accident caused by the bus owned by the Appellant Transport

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.2914 of 2021

Corporation on 24.11.2015.

(a) both forearm fracture

(b) left thigh fracture and

(c) right foot fracture

6. The nature of injuries sustained by the respondent / claimant has

not been disputed by the Appellant / Transport Corporation. The

Medical Board has assessed the disability of the respondent at 45% as

seen from the report filed by them before the Tribunal which has been

marked as an Exhibit. The respondent / claimant was a Farmer and

Mason and was aged 43 years. After giving due consideration to the

nature of injuries sustained by the respondent/ claimant, the Tribunal has

rightly adopted the multiplier method for assessing the loss of earning

capacity to the respondent/ claimant. As seen from the discharge

summary, which has been marked as Ex.P9 before the Tribunal, the

respondent/ claimant was hospitalized.

7. This Court does not find any infirmity in the findings of the

Tribunal as regards the award of compensation to the respondent /

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.2914 of 2021

claimant by adopting the multiplier method.

8. The Tribunal has fixed the notional monthly income of the

respondent / claimant at Rs.11,000/- and has adopted the correct

multiplier of 14 as the deceased was aged 43 years at the time of the

accident. The Tribunal has accepted the disability assessed by the

Medical Board at 45% which is a whole body disability. This Court does

not find any infirmity in the findings of the Tribunal.

9. The Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs.75,000/-

towards pain and suffering, Rs.50,000/- towards medical expenses,

Rs.50,000/- towards transport charges and Rs.30,000/- towards extra

nourishment which cannot be considered to be excessive, after giving

due consideration to the year of the accident and the nature of injuries

sustained by the respondent / claimant.

10. For the foregoing reasons this Court does not find any

infirmity in the findings of the Tribunal. Therefore, there is no merit in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.2914 of 2021

this appeal and accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is

dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.

11. The Appellant /Transport Corporation is directed to deposit

the entire award amount awarded by the Tribunal together with interest at

7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of realization, less

the amount, if any, already deposited to the credit of MCOP No.420 of

2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub

Court Cuddalore, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is

directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank account of the

respondent / claimant through RTGS, within a period of two weeks

thereafter.

08.10.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order ab/vsi2

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.2914 of 2021

ab

To

1. The Special Sub Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Cuddalore.

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

CMA.No.2914 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.16694 of 2021

08.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter