Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Ramasamy vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 20763 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20763 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Ramasamy vs The District Collector on 8 October, 2021
                                                                  W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015


                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 08.10.2021

                                                       CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                        W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 and 37764 of 2015
                                        and WMP Nos.6690, 6689, 6687 of 2021

                     WP No.6043 of 2021

                     R.Ramasamy                                               ..Petitioner


                                                         Vs.

                     1. The District Collector,
                        Coimbatore.

                     2. The District Revenue Officer,
                        Coimbatore District.
                        Coimbatore.

                     3. The Block Development Officer,
                        Karamadai Block,
                        Mettupalayam Taluk,
                        Coimbatore District.

                     4. The Tahsildar,
                        Mettupalayam, Coimbatore.

                     5. The President,

                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                              W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015


                            Chikkadasampalayam Panchayat,
                            Karamadai Taluk,
                            Coimbatore District.                 ..Respondents

WP No.37764 of 2015

1. A.Priya

2. M.Velusamy

3. L.Parameswari

4. Sathish Kumar

5. Suseela

6. R.Gnanashanmugham

7. V.Muralidharan

8. M.Subramaniam

9. M.Meenakshi

10. S.Arumugam

11. S.Manimekala

12. A.Ramasamy ..Petitioners

Vs.

1. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District.

Coimbatore.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

4. The Tahsildar Mettupalayam Coimbatore District ...Respondents

Prayer in WP No.6043 of 2021 : Writ Petition filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of

Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to order in

No.954/2020/A4 dated 18.02.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent to

5th respondent and direct the respondents 1 to 4 stop to providing

basic amenities until the disposal of suit in O.S.No.405 of 2016 on

the file of the Additional District Judge IV, Coimbatore.

Prayer in WP No.21132 of 2019 : Writ Petition filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of

Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the

proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 06.11.2015 in

O.Mu.No.9746/2015/A2 quash the same and consequently direct the

4th respondent to grant patta in favour of the petitioners 1 to 11

herein for their respective properties in Survey No.105/1A at

Chikkadasampalayam Village, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

District.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Tamilavel in WP No.6043 of 2021 M/s.J.Pothiraj in WPNo.37764 of 2015

For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran in WP No.6043 of 2021 Government Counsel for R1 MR.U.Bharanidharan Government Advocate for R2 and R3 Ms.Amirta for R4

in WP No.37764 of 2015 Mr.U.Bharanidharan Government Advocate for R1 to R4

COMMONORDER

The issue involved in both the writ petitions are common and

hence they are taken up together, heard and disposed of through this

common order.

2. The subject matter of challenge pertains to the impugned

proceedings of the Block Development Officer dated 18.02.2021, wherein

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

the direction has been given to the President of the Panchayat to

proceed further to provide amenities for nearly 105 families who are

living in SF No.105/1A, 105/1B.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

4. On carefully going through the materials placed before this

Court and after considering the submissions made on either side, the

main dispute seems to be the identification of the property. This Court in

exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

cannot undertake such an exercise. However, there is a suit pending in

OS.No. 405 of 2016, on the file of the Vth Additonal District Judge,

Coimbatore, wherein the petitioner in W.P.No. 6043 of 2021 along with

his wife have filed a substantive suit against the official respondents as

well as the allottees of the lands. The issue regarding the identiy of the

property can be undertaken in the pending suit on the basis of the

evidence adduced before the Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

suit was filed in the year 2016 and the defendents have not filed any

written statement and as a result of the same, the suit is getting

adjourned from time to time. The learned counsel further submitted

that during the pendency of the suit, the official respondents in a hasty

manner have proceeded to provide amenities in the property belonging

to the petitioner and which has been wrongly identified by the

respondents.

6. In the considered view of this Court, it will be fit and proper

if a direction is issued to the Court below to dispose of the suit within a

time frame. It is made clear that the official defendants shall file a

written statement within the period of 6 weeks from the date of reciept

of the copy of this order. Thereafter, the Court below shall proceed to

frame the issues and conduct the trial. The final judgment and decree

shall be passed within a period of 6 months from the date of reciept of

the copy of this order. If the official respondents do not file the written

statement within the time stipulated by this Court, it is left open to the

Court below to set them ex-parte and proceed further to decide the suit

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

based on the materials placed by the petitioner. Whatever decisions are

taken by the official respondents, will be subject to the result of the

suit.

7. Both the writ petitions are disposed accordingly. No

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.10.2021

rka To

1. The District Collector, Coimbatore.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District.

Coimbatore.

3. The Block Development Officer, Karamadai Block, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District.

4. The Tahsildar, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore.

5. The President, Chikkadasampalayam Panchayat, Karamadai Taluk, Coimbatore District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 & 37764 of 2015

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rka

W.P.Nos.6043 of 2021 and 37764 of 2015 and WMP Nos.6690, 6689, 6687 of 2021

08.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter