Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20743 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2021
1 S.A.No.1165 OF 1996
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.No.1165 of 1996
1. S.Feroz Ahmed
2. S.K.Ajeez Ahmed
3. Sahavar Sulthana
4. Nazrath Sulthana
5. Israth Sulthana
6. Nihar Sulthana
7. Yasmin Sulthana
8. Sahin Sulthana
9. Munavar Sulthana ... Appellants /
Appellants in Cross Appeal/
Respondents 7 to 15 /
Nil (Heirs of D5)
Vs.
1. Zaibunnisa
2. Nasni
3. A.M.Jabin
4. A.Nazir
5. A.Sharin
6. M.A.Jaffar ... Respondents / Respondents /
Plaintiffs 1, 3 to 7
7. M.Mohamed Hameedudin ... Respondent / Respondent /
1st Defendant
8. M.Shamsudin ... Respondent / Respondent /
2nd Defendant
9. Mazar ... Respondent / Respondent /
3rd Defendant
10.Kaniz Fathima ... Respondent / Respondent /
4th Defendant
11. Chotta John ... Respondent / Respondent /
6th Defendant
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
2 S.A.No.1165 OF 1996
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of
C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in Cross Appeal in
A.S.No.16 of 1993 on the file of the District Judge, Trichy,
confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.10.1992 made
in O.S.No.89 of 1985 on the file of the Sub Court, Trichy.
For Appellants : Mr.P.Thiyagarajan
***
JUDGMENT
Shri.P.Thiyagarajan, learned counsel representing for
the appellants states that in the office bundle, he has come
across the letter dated 26.01.2004 purportedly written by the
appellants stating that the matter can be dismissed as settled
out of Court. The said letter dated 26.01.2004 has also been
notarised. The learned counsel has also produced the letter in
original.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2. In view of the letter dated 26.01.2004 written by
the appellants, this second appeal is dismissed as settled out
of Court. The said letter shall form part of the record. No
costs.
07.10.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1. The District Judge, Trichy.
2. The Sub Judge, Trichy.
3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
S.A.No.1165 of 1996
07.10.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!