Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.National Insurance Company ... vs Rangamma
2021 Latest Caselaw 20510 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20510 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.National Insurance Company ... vs Rangamma on 6 October, 2021
                                                                           CMA.No.3007 of 2007

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 06.10.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                                C.M.A.No. 3007 of 2007


                     M/s.National Insurance Company Ltd.,
                     Mettupalayam Branch, R.V.R. Building,
                     (First Floor) 157, Karamadai,
                     Mettupalayam.                                        ... Appellant
                                                     Vs.

                     Rangasamy (Died)
                     1. Rangamma
                     2.K. Venkatachalapathi
                     3.Muthuselvan                                         ...Respondents

                          Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree passed in MACT
                     O.P. No.72 of 1993, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
                     District Judge, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District, Dated 16.04.2007.

                                    For Appellant : Mrs. B. Surekha
                                    For Respondents : R1 to R3 - No Appearance


                                                     JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging

its liability to pay the compensation under the impugned award dated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

16.04.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District

Judge, Udhagamandalam in M.C.O.P. No.72 of 1993.

2. Heard, Mrs. B. Surekha, learned counsel for the Appellant.

3. The Appellant has challenged the impugned award on the

ground that since the deceased is himself the insured, the claimants who

are his dependants are not entitled for any compensation. According to

them, the Tribunal under the impugned award has erroneously awarded

compensation to the respondent/ claimant. In support of the contentions

raised by the Appellant in this Appeal, learned counsel for the Appellant

drew the attention of this Court to the following authorities :

i) Naveen Kumar Vs Vijay Kumar & Others reported in CDJ 2018 SC 071 and

ii) TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited vs Govindarajan and 2 others, decision of a Single Bench of this Court dated 10.09.2020 passed in CMA No.4862 of 2019.

4. Learned counsel for the Appellant also drew the attention of this

Court to Paragraph No.14 of the impugned award, where a categorical

finding has been given by the Tribunal stating that the registration

certificate for the insured vehicle stands in the name of one A. Arul, who https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

is the insured and who is the deceased and for whom compensation has

been claimed by his dependants in M.C.O.P. No. 72 of 1993 which is the

subject matter of this Appeal. As seen from the impugned award, the

accident happened on 01.09.1992 and on the date of the accident the

Registration Certificate for the insured vehicle stood only in the name of

the insured (A. Arul) and only thereafter, after his death, it was

transferred in the name of his mother with effect from 02.09.1992 and

thereafter in the name of the second respondent, Muthuselvan with effect

from 19.12.1993. Therefore, it is very clear that the deceased cannot be

considered to be a third party as he himself is the insured.

5. The Appellant /Insurance Company is statutorily liable to pay

the compensation only if the conditions stipulated under Section 147 of

the Motor Vehicles Act have been satisfied.

6. In the case on hand, the conditions have not been satisfied and

therefore, the Insurance Company is not statutorily liable to pay the

compensation as the deceased himself is the insured and is not a third

party.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

7. The decisions relied upon by the learned counsel for the

Appellant referred to supra also supports the Appellant's case.

8. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the considered view

that erroneously, the Tribunal has fastened the liability on the Appellant

Insurance Company under the impugned award. Hence, the impugned

award dated 16.04.2007 passed by the learned District Judge, Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District in

MCOP No.72 of 1993, is hereby set aside as against the appellant /

Insurance Company and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No

costs.

06.10.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

ab/vsi2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

To

1. The District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

ab

CMA.No.3007 of 2007

06.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter