Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Sathiamoorthy vs The Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 20202 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20202 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Madras High Court
V.Sathiamoorthy vs The Inspector Of Police on 1 October, 2021
                                                                                   Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 01.10.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                                  Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

                     V.Sathiamoorthy.                                              ... Petitioner

                                                             Versus
                     The Inspector of Police,
                     W23 All Women Police Station
                     Royapettah,
                     Chennai
                     Cr. No.1 of 2014                                              ... Respondent

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
                     Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Crl MP No.5346 of
                     2021 dated 21.06.2021 on the file of the Learned XVIII Metropolitan
                     Magistrate, Saidapet and set aside the same, thereby permitting for
                     renewal of the passport of the petitioner bearing No. J4490193 pending
                     with the Trichy Regional Passport authority in reference No.
                     TR1073174460320 and further to permit the petitioner to travel to US for
                     his employment purpose.
                                       For Petitioner    :       Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar.

                                       For Respondents :         Mr.A.Damodharan,
                                                                 Addl. Public Prosecutor.

                     Page No.1 of 10


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                   Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021




                                                           ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set-aside the order

passed by the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet in

Crl.M.P.No.5346 of 2021 dated 21.06.2021.

2. The petitioner, who is A1 in C.C.No.2165 of 2015, is facing

trial for the offences under Sections 498 and 406 IPC r/w 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner

had filed a Crl.M.P.No.5346 of 2021 before the XVIII Metropolitan

Magistrate Court, Saidapet seeking permission to travel abroad for the

purpose of renewing his passport and the Trial Court, by an order dated

21.06.2021, dismissed the same. Against which, the present petition has

been filed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is a citizen of India and a permanent Resident of USA. He is

holding a Green Card in USA and he is living in Washington DC and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

working at Neustar, Washington DC as Manager. The petitioner has

filed a divorce petition before the Loudoun Conty Circuit Court, Virginia,

USA in the year 2013, in which, the defacto comlainant failed to

participate and thereafter, exparte divorce was granted in favour of the

petitioner. The petitioner has also filed a divorce petition before the Sub-

court, Thanjavur on the ground of cruelty. The petitioner's ex-wife,

Mahalakshmi as counter blast had filed a petition under Section 9 of the

Hindu Marriages Act for restitution of Conjugal Rights in HMOP

No.3845 of 2013 before the Family Court, Chennai. Later, the divorce

petition filed by the petitioner before the Subordinate Court, Thanjavur,

had been transferred to Family Court, Chennai and renumbered as HMOP

No.2190 of 2014. The petitioner's wife had also filed M.C.No.507 of

2013 before the Family Court, Chennai, seeking maintenance. This being

the case, a criminal complaint in Crime No.1 of 2014 for the offences

under Sections 406, 498A IPC, came to be registered on 09.01.2014.

Later, on conclusion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed in this

case, which is pending in C.C.No.2165 of 2015. In that case, along with

the petitioner, his parents and 10 of his relatives are arrayed as accused.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

Thereafter, a look out circular had also been issued against the petitioner.

Not knowing the same, the petitioner had landed in the year 2014.

Thereafter, he was detained and after showing the order of this court, he

was let out. Thereafter, the petitioner has been travelling on various

dates from India to USA., i.e., from 01.09.2014 to 16.11.2014,

18.05.2015 to 31.05.2015, 11.10.2015 to 18.10.2015, 24.07.2016 to

03.08.2016, 14.01.2017 to 12.02.2017, 18.11.1027 to 03.12.2017,

07.04.2018 to 22.04.2018, 29.10.2018 to 26.11.2018, 27.10.2019 to

18.11.2019 and 15.12.2019 to 28.12.2019 and lastly, he has come down

to India, in the month of October 2020, to visit his parents and to attend

some family functions. Thereafter, he was staying for some time and

later for the purpose of renewing his Passport bearing No.J4490193,

which was to expire by June 2021, he had applied for the renewal with

the Trichy Regional Passport Office on 23.12.2020 vide reference

No.TR1073174460320 and vide communication dated 18.01.2021, they

directed the petitioner to get permission from the Court for travelling

abroad. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed a petition in WP No. (MD)

No.4070 of 2021 and the same was dismissed on 18.03.2021 with a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

direction to the petitioner to approach the Criminal Court or Appellate

Court, wherever, Criminal cases are pending, and seek appropriate

direction for renewal of his passport. As per the direction, the petitioner

had filed a petition before the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet in

Crl.M..No.5346 of 2021 and the same was dismissed on 21.06.2021.

Hence, the petitioner is before this Court with the petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that

some of the accused in this case had filed discharge petition, which came

to be dismissed by the lower court and against which a revision petition

in Crl.R.C.No.1342 of 2018 has been filed before this Court and this

Court, by order dated 27.03.2019 dismissed the said revision. Thereafter,

they had approached the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP.Cr.No.2973 of 2020.

The Hon'ble Apex Court, by an order dated 10.07.2020 had issued notice

and further stayed the impugned judgment. In view of the same, no trial

is proceeding as of now. He further submitted that as per the U.S law, a

Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) to have maintain their status, for

which, they have to follow certain guidelines. In the U.S Embassy &

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

Consulates notice, it is mentioned as follows :-

"If you plan on remaining outside the United States for longer than one year, you must apply for a re-entry permit(Form 1-131) with the U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services. Extensions of LPR Status may not be obtained from outside the United States."

Thus, the petitioner, being a LPR, if he seeks extension of LPR status, it

has to be done only in United State and not outside, for which, the

petitioner has to necessarily travel. He further submitted that if an LPR

planning to travel outside of the United States for one year or more, it is

important that he has to apply for a reentry permit before he depart

United States. If he stay outside United States for one year or more and

did not apply for a reentry permit before he leave, he may be considered

to have abandoned his permanent resident status. If this happens, he may

be referred to appear before an immigration judge to decide whether or

not he has abandoned his status. Hence, for renewal of his LPR status,

he is necessarily to travel to United States, for which, he has to apply for

his renewal of passport and has to travel to United States. Otherwise,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

great prejudice would cause and irreparable loss would be created,

which cannot be rectified easily and his status cannot be restored back.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that in this

case, the petitioner, who is A1, along with 10 other accused are facing

trial for the offences under Sections 406, 498(A) IPC, r/w 4 of Dowry

Prohibition Act in C.C.No.2165 of 2015. The case is of the year 2015

and for the past 6 years, the case is pending without trial since one or

other accused are filing one petition or other and successfully staling the

trial. Some of the accused have filed a discharge petition, which came to

be dismissed, against which, they had filed a Revision Petition and this

court had also dismissed the same. Aggrieved over the same. they filed a

petition before the Apex Court, in which, the Apex Court ordered notice

and also granted Stay. The apprehension of the prosecution is that if the

petitioner is permitted to travel to United States, he will never return

back and it would further add to the delay of the trial in the C.C.No.2165

of 2015.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted

that no such delay would be caused at the instance of the petitioner and

he is ready to file an affidavit before the trial Court informing that he

would never be the reason or the cause, for any delay. If the presence of

the petitioner is required by the trial Court, he would appear and submit

to the trial Court orders. Whenever his presence is absolutely necessary,

he shall appear. On the other dates, his counsel would continue with the

proceedings and will not seek any adjournments or defer the cross

examination for the reason that instruction is to be received from the

petitioner and the presence of the petitioner is required. He further

submitted that return of passport is only for the purpose of renewal and

he will be back to India after completing his work and the formalities

there. Since his root is in India and his parents and family are in India,

he has to necessarily come back.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

7. In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to file an

undertaking affidavit to that effect before the Court below. This Court

directs the Regional Passport Office, Trichy to renew the passport

bearing No.J4490193 and also to permit the petitioner to undertake his

travel to USA.

8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is

disposed of.

01.10.2021 Index: Yes/No

mrp

Note : Issue order copy on 08.10.2021

To

The Inspector of Police, W23 All Women Police Station Royapettah, Chennai

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

mrp

CRL.O.P.No.13333 of 2021

01.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter