Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23446 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021
1 CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18807 OF 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18807 of 2021 and
CRL.M.P.(MD)Nos.10427 & 10428 of 2021
1. Moses
2. Paul Charles @ Charles ... Petitioners / Accused 2 & 3
Vs.
State rep. By,
1. The Inspector of Police,
Kuruvikulam police station,
Kuruvikulam,
Tenkasi District.
(Crime No.298 of 2020) ... Respondent / Complainant
2. Ajith ... Respondent /
Defacto Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section
482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the
proceedings in C.C.No.180 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate, Sankarankovil in so far as the petitioners herein
and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Selvakumar
For R-1 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar,
Additional Public Prosecutor.
***
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
2 CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18807 OF 2021
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. This criminal original petition has been filed for
quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.180 of 2021 on the file of
the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil.
3. The petitioners' counsel reiterated all the contentions
set out in the memorandum of grounds.
4. As rightly pointed out by the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor, consideration of the aforesaid grounds would
invoke embarking on a factual probe. The Hon'ble Supreme
Court in a recent decision reported in AIR 2021 SC 1918
(Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., V. State of Maharashtra)
has held that the criminal proceedings ought not to be
scuttled by undertaking a factual analysis of the rival
contentions.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3 CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18807 OF 2021
5. Therefore, leaving open the petitioners' contentions
and defences, this criminal original petition is dismissed.
Taking note of facts and circumstances of this case, the
personal appearance of the petitioners before the Court below
is dispensed with. However, the petitioners have to appear
before the Court below on the following three occasions:-
i) To answer the charges,
ii) at the time of examination under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.
and
iii) at the time of pronouncement of Judgment.
The petitioners also will have to appear when their presence is
insisted upon by the trial Court and on all other occasions, the
petitioners can be represented by their counsel. If the
petitioners' counsel also fails to appear, the benefit of this
order will stand vacated automatically. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
30.11.2021
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes/ No
PMU
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4 CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18807 OF 2021
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
PMU
To:
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil.
2. The Inspector of Police, Kuruvikulam police station, Kuruvikulam, Tenkasi District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18807 of 2021
30.11.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!