Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Padmaja vs The Commissioner
2021 Latest Caselaw 23420 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23420 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Madras High Court
Padmaja vs The Commissioner on 30 November, 2021
                                                                              W.P. No.3052 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    Dated 30.11.2021

                                                         CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                                  W.P. No.3052 of 2020



                     Padmaja                                                       .. Petitioner

                                                          Versus

                     1. The Commissioner,
                        Corporation of Chennai,
                        Rippon Building, Park Town,
                        Chennai 600 003.
                     2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
                        Corporation of Chennai,
                        Division No.98, Zone No.7, No.1217,
                        Arunachalam Pandaram Street,
                        Koyapettai, Chennai 600 012.
                     3. C.Panneerselvam
                     4. The Tahsildar,
                        Purasawalkam,
                        Chennai.                                               .. Respondents
                     [R4, Suo-motu impleaded as per the order of this Court
                      dated 22.04.2021 in W.P.No.3052 of 2020]




                     Page No.1 / 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                           W.P. No.3052 of 2020




                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent
                     herein to pass appropriate order to remove the unauthorized construction
                     and enroachments committed by the third respondent situated at the
                     premises of Corporation Road at Ramanujalu Garden Street, Perambur
                     Barracks, Chennai 600 012, of temple namely Arul Mighu Sri
                     Periyapalayathamman Alayam & Jai Anjeneyar Alayam adjacent to the
                     premises of the Writ Petitioner herein, with reference to the covered
                     judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court order dated 18.01.2013 in the
                     matter of Union of India vs. State of Gujarath and others under SLP
                     No.8519 of 2006, by disposing the representation dated 19.09.2019 within
                     the stipulated period prescribed by this Court.


                                  For petitioner     : Mr.G.Thangavel

                                  For respondents
                                   for RR1 & 2       : Mr.K.Raja Shrinivas
                                   for R3            : Mr.Na.Malai Saravanan
                                   for R4            : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal


                                                             ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J)

The Writ Petition is heard through video conferencing.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.3052 of 2020

2. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to issue a Writ of Mandamus,

directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the enroachment made by the

third respondent situated at Ramanujalu Garden Street, Perambur Barracks,

Chennai, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 19.09.2019.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Mr.G.Thangavel

would argue that the petitioner is the owner of the property bearing Old

Door No.11/2E, New No.20, Ramanujalu Garden, by virtue of sale deed

dated 07.02.2011. According to the learned counsel, the third respondent

owns a property at Door No.19, Ramanujalu Garden Street and he has

constructed a compound wall in the public passage, resulting the petitioner

could not use the road.

4. It is further contended that though the petitioner has succeeded in

the Civil Suit, but so far, the encroachment has not been removed. Hence, it

would suffice if a direction is issued to the official respondents to take

appropriate action on the representation of the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.3052 of 2020

5. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents

1 and 2 Mr.K.Raja Shrinivas, would state that the the four

respondent/Tahsildar may be directed to demarcate the property and based

on the report of the Tahsildar, the respondents 1 and 2 are ready to take

action against the alleged unauthorized construction in the public passage.

6. Heard Mr.G.Thangavel, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Mr.K.Raja Shrinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the

respondents 1 and 2, Mr.Na.Malai Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for

the third respondent and Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the fourth respondent.

7. In the light of the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition and the

submissions of the learned counsels, we hereby direct the fourth

respondent/Tahsildar, Purasawalkam, to conduct a survey in the land in

dispute in the presence of the parties and based on report of the Tahsildar,

the second respondent shall take appropriate action, within a period of three

months.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.3052 of 2020

8. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No

costs.




                                                                          [M.K.K.S, J] [V.S.G., J]
                                                                               30.11.2021
                     Speaking order: Yes/No
                     Index         : Yes/No
                     pvs

                     To
                     1. The Commissioner,
                        Corporation of Chennai,
                        Rippon Building, Park Town,
                        Chennai 600 003.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Division No.98, Zone No.7, No.1217, Arunachalam Pandaram Street, Koyapettai, Chennai 600 012.

3. The Tahsildar, Purasawalkam, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.3052 of 2020

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

pvs

W.P. No.3052 of 2020

30.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter