Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhusan Garg vs The State Rep. By
2021 Latest Caselaw 23331 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23331 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Madras High Court
Bhusan Garg vs The State Rep. By on 29 November, 2021
                                                         1         CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18702 OF 2021

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 29.11.2021

                                                       CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                    Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.18702 & 18706 of 2021 and
                                  CRL.M.P.(MD)Nos.10353 to 10355 & 10357 of 2021

                     1. Bhusan Garg,
                        Director,
                        M/s.Shambu Kaini Pvt. Ltd.,
                        K.H.No.1110/132, Village Rithiala,
                        Delhi – 110 085.

                     2. Vishal Garg,
                        Director,
                        M/s.Shambu Kaini Pvt. Ltd.,
                        K.H.No.1110/132, Village Rithiala,
                        Delhi – 110 085.      ... Petitioners / Accused 5 & 6
                                                      in both petitions
                                                             Vs.
                     The State rep. By,
                     The Food Safety Officer,
                     Madurai Corporation – Code No.572,
                     O/o.Designated Officer,
                     The Food Safety and Drug Administration Department,
                     Viswanathapuram,
                     Madurai – 625 014.        ... Respondent / Complainant
                                                    in both petitions
                                  Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section
                     482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the private
                     complaint in S.T.C.Nos.3058 & 3059 of 2021 pending before
                     the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai under Sections
                     58, 59(i) and 63 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006
                     and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/4
                                                            2        CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18702 OF 2021

                                  (in both Crl.O.Ps.)
                                  For Petitioners    : Mr.S.I.Muthiah
                                  For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar,
                                                   Additional Public Prosecutor.

                                                            ***


                                               COMMON ORDER



                                  Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

                     and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for

                     the respondent.



                                  2. The petitioners are facing prosecution for the offences

                     under Sections 58, 59(i) and 63 of the Food Safety and

                     Standards Act, 2006.

                                  3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

                     reiterated all the contentions set out in the memorandum of

                     grounds.

                                  4. In view of the decision of this Court reported in

                     MANU/TN/2513/2019                  (Jeetmal   Ramesh    Kumar     Vs.   The

                     Commissioner,            Food      Safety     and   Drug   Administration

                     Department and Ors.), I am not in a position to grant relief

                     under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     2/4
                                                          3        CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18702 OF 2021



                                  5. Leaving open all the contentions and the defences of

                     the petitioners, this criminal original petitions are dismissed.

                     Taking note of the facts and circumstances of this case, the

                     personal appearance of the petitioners before the Court below

                     is dispensed with. However, the petitioners have to appear

                     before the Court below on the following three occasions:-

                                  i) To answer the charges,

                                  ii) at the time of examination under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.

                     and

                                  iii) at the time of pronouncement of Judgment.

                     The petitioners also will have to appear when their presence is

                     insisted upon by the trial Court and on all other occasions, the

                     petitioners can be represented by their counsel. If the

                     petitioners' counsel also fails to appear, the benefit of this

                     order          will   stand     vacated   automatically.   Consequently,

                     connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.



                                                                                 29.11.2021

                     Index              : Yes / No
                     Internet           : Yes/ No
                     PMU


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     3/4
                                                           4          CRL.O.P.(MD)NO.18702 OF 2021

                                                                       G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai.

2. The Food Safety Officer, Madurai Corporation – Code No.572, O/o.Designated Officer, The Food Safety and Drug Administration Department, Viswanathapuram, Madurai – 625 014.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.18702 & 18706 of 2021

29.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter