Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vetrivel Forgings vs 2/8
2021 Latest Caselaw 23286 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23286 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Madras High Court
Vetrivel Forgings vs 2/8 on 29 November, 2021
                                                                 WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 29-11-2021

                                                     CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                          WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016
                                                     And
                                         WMP Nos.11987 to 11992 of 2016



                     Vetrivel Forgings,
                     HTSC No.214,
                     G-48 & G-49,
                     Sidco Industrial Estate,
                     Kakkalur,
                     Tiruvallur – Represented by its
                     Authorised Signatory T.B.Nathan ..     Petitioner in WP 13694/2016



                     Servalakshmi Paper Ltd.,
                     HTSC No.222,
                     Vaduganpatti Post,
                     I.C.Pettai,
                     Tirunelveli – 627 010 Represented by its
                     Deputy General Manager-Accounts
                     Mr.H.S.Seetharaman.               ..     Petitioner in WP 13695/2016




                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                    WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

                     Servalakshmi Paper Ltd.,
                     HTSC No.209,
                     Kodaganallur Village,
                     Vettuvankulam Road,
                     Melakallur,
                     Tirunelveli – 627 010 Represented by its
                     Deputy General Manager-Accounts
                     Mr.H.S.Seetharaman.               ..     Petitioner in WP 13696/2016


                                                           vs.


                     The State of Tamil Nadu,
                     Represented by its Secretary to Government,
                     Energy Department,
                     Fort St. George,
                     Chennai – 600 009.                 ..       R-1 in all WPs

                     The Chairman and Managing Director,
                     TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                     144, Anna Salai,
                     Chennai – 600 002.              ..             R-2 in all WPs

                     The Superintending Engineer,
                     TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                     Kanchipuram Electricity Distribution Circle,
                     KANCHIPURAM.                       ..        R-3 in WP 13694/2016


                     The Superintending Engineer,
                     TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                     Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle,
                     TIRUNELVELI.                         ..        R-3 in WPs 13695&
                                                                               13696/2016


                     2/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                   WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016


                                  WP 13694 of 2016 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the
                     second and third respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on

maximum demand charges from the petitioner in H.T.Sc.No.214, as per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc., batch in M/s.Sri Krishna Alloys and Etc. vs. Union of India and others etc.

WP 13695 of 2016 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second and third respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner in H.T.Sc.No.222, as per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc., batch in M/s.Sri Krishna Alloys and Etc. vs. Union of India and others etc.

WP 13696 of 2016 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second and third respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner in H.T.Sc.No.209, as per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc., batch in M/s.Sri Krishna Alloys and Etc. vs. Union of India and others etc.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

For Petitioner in all WPs : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy

For Respondent-1 in all WPs: Mr.C.Selvaraj, Additional Government Pleader.

For Respondents-2 and 3 : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, in all WPs Standing Counsel for TANGEDCO.

COMMON ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed for the issue of Writ of

Mandamus forbearing the second and third respondents from demanding

and collecting tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioners.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that a batch of

Special Leave petitions are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and

the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed an interim order dated 31.08.2012,

restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting

supply of electricity subject to the petitioners paying all the charges/dues

except the tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand.

3. This Court had an occasion to deal with a similar issue in

WP No.19104 of 2020 and final orders were passed on 17.02.2021. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

relevant portions in the order are extracted hereunder :-

“5. Mr.N.Damodaran, learned Standing Counsel, who took notice on behalf of the respondents would submit that by following the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a Division Bench of this Court has disposed of issue on the following terms:-

“In view of the issue raised in the present writ appeal / writ petition being settled against the appellant / petitioner in terms of the Division Bench judgment in W.P.Nos. 159 of 2008 etc.(Batch) decided on 15.06.2012 and thereafter, the Hon'ble Supreme Court having entertained the Special Leave Appeals against the said judgment bearing Special Leave Appeal (Civil) Nos.

24685 to 24719 of 2012 dated 31.08.2012, with an interim direction restraining the respondent from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting the supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

therein, subject to that petitioner paying all the charges / dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand, it is agreed that the present writ appeal and writ petition be disposed of in terms aforesaid, with the agreement that the ultimate fate of the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court would also govern the present appellant and the writ petitioner and the same interim order would continue to enure for the benefit of the writ appeal and writ petitioner during the pendency of the Special Leave Appeals.

2. Writ Appeal and Writ Petition, accordingly, stand disposed of. No

of 2004 stands closed.”

6. On the issue of collecting tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner in the High Tension Service Connection, the Hon'ble Supreme Court and a Division Bench of this Court has already issued a direction, restraining the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

respondents from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner subject to the petitioner paying all the charges / dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand.”

4. The above order will also enure to the benefit of the

petitioners. In view of the same, all these present writ petitions are disposed

of in terms of the interim order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and

the subsequent Hon'ble Division Bench order passed in W.A No.547 of

2004 dated 02.06.2015. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29-11-2021 Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Svn

To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos.13694 to 13696 of 2016

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO Ltd., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO Ltd., Kanchipuram Electricity Distribution Circle, KANCHIPURAM.

4.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO Ltd., Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, TIRUNELVELI.

WPs 13694 to 13696 of 2016

29-11-2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter