Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thavamani vs Sameen Banu
2021 Latest Caselaw 21849 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21849 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2021

Madras High Court
Thavamani vs Sameen Banu on 1 November, 2021
                                                                          C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021


                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 01.11.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

                                          C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021
                                                       and
                                          C.M.P.(MD) No.8659 of 2021

                     Thavamani               ... Petitioner /Petitioner/ Proposed party

                                                       Vs.
                     1.Sameen Banu
                     2.Sirajjudin Ahmed
                     3.Basheer Ahmed         ...Respondents 1 to 3 /Respondents 1 to 3 /
                                                                               Plaintiffs
                     4.Rajangam
                     5.Geetharamani
                     6.Venkatraman
                     7.Eswaran               ... Respondents 4 to 7 / Respondents 4 to 7/
                                                                              Defendants

                     PRAYER:       Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of
                     Constitution of India, to allow the Civil Revision Petition and set aside


                     1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                            C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021


                     the fair and decreetal order dated 19.08.2021 made in I.A.No.4 of 2021
                     in O.S.No.309 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court,
                     Dindigul.


                                   For Petitioner        : Mr.H.Arumugam
                                                          for N.Vignesh


                                                      ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the

dismissal order dated 19.08.2021 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2021 in O.S.

No.309 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul,

filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead

the petitioner as one the defendant in the suit.

2.The case of the petitioner is that during the pendency of

the suit, the fifth respondent / second defendant had suppressing the

pending suit and had falsely represented that she alone is entitled to the

suit property and entered into a sale agreement on 24.08.2016 by

receiving an advance of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) and

agreed to execute a sale deed in favour of the petitioner within one year.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

When the fifth respondent / second defendant failed to execute the sale

deed, the petitioner enquired and came to know about the pendency of

the suit and hence, she filed a petition to implead her as a necessary party

to the suit.

3.The respondents 1 to 3 / Plaintiffs had filed a counter

contending that the suit is in the fag end of the trial and the arguments of

the plaintiffs were adduced and at that stage, the petition was filed with a

view to delay the pronouncement of judgment. The respondents 1 to 3 /

plaintiffs had further contended that the petition had been filed by the

petitioner at the instigation of the power of attorney holder of the fifth

respondent / second defendant and that the agreement had been entered

during the pendency of the suit and that the petitioner is not a necessary

party to the suit.

4.The fifth respondent / second defendant had filed a counter

stating that the suit items 2 and 3 are purchased by the fifth respondent /

second defendant for a sale consideration on 07.02.2002 under a sale

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

deed registered as document No.190/2002. SRO, Dindigul and after

purchase, she had executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of the

present power agent by virtue of document No.2649/2014, at the Office

of the Joint Registrar-I, Dindigul and on the strength of the Power of

Attorney Deed, the Power Agent had entered into a sale agreement with

the petitioner on 24.08.2016.

5.The trial Court after hearing both the parties held that the

rights of the petitioner is subservient to the rights of the second

defendant in the suit and is subject to any adjudication that has been

made in the suit and dismissed the petition holding that the petitioner is

not a necessary party to the proper adjudication of the suit. Against

which, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

6.Mr.H.Arumugam, learned counsel representing

Mr.N.Vignesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner had entered into a sale agreement with the fifth

respondent /second defendant on 24.08.2016 and an advance amount of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) was paid and the fifth

respondent /second defendant had agreed to execute a sale deed in favour

of the petitioner within one year. Since the fifth respondent /second

defendant did not come forward to execute a sale deed, on enquiry, the

petitioner found that the suit was pending and thereby, the petitioner had

filed a petition seeking to implead her as a necessary party in order to

protect her interest. He would further submit that if the petitioner is not

permitted to be impleaded, it would cause prejudice and irreparable loss

to the petitioner.

7.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused

the materials available on record.

8.The suit had been filed by the respondents 1 to 3/plaintiffs

on 29.09.2009, for declaration and injunction. While the suit was

pending, the fifth respondent/ second defendant is stated to have been

entered into an agreement on 24.08.2016 and received an advance

amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) from the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

The petitioner had entered into an agreement, during the pendency of the

suit. As rightly held by the learned trial Judge, the rights of the petitioner

is subservient to the rights of the fifth respondent /second defendant in

the suit and subject to any adjudication and decision to be made in the

suit.

9.In view of the same, this Court does not find any infirmity

or error in the order passed by the trial Court holding that the rights of

the petitioner is subservient to the rights of the fifth respondent /second

defendant.

10.In the result, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                  01.11.2021
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     rm





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                           C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021


Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

The Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

rm

C.R.P.(MD) No.1585 of 2021

01.11.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter