Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Kudiarasan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6358 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6358 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Kudiarasan on 10 March, 2021
                                                                               C.M.A.No.761 of 2021



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 10.03.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
                                                       AND
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP


                                              C.M.A.No.761 of 2021
                                                      and
                                              C.M.P.No.4566 of 2021

                The Managing Director,
                Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.,
                Division II, Villupuram,
                Vellore.                                                       ... Appellant

                                                        vs
                1.Kudiarasan
                  S/o.S.Sivagnanam

                2.Tamilarasi
                  D/o.Sivagnanam                                               ... Respondents

                Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed u/s.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
                1988, against the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2018 passed in
                M.C.O.P.No.87 of 2017 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III
                Additional District Judge, Vellore, Tirupathur.
                                      For Appellant     :      Mr.S.Sairaman
                                                       *****


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/8
                                                                                  C.M.A.No.761 of 2021



                                                       JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBBIAH, J]

The matter is heard through Video Conferencing.

2. For the sake of convenience, appellant herein is referred to as

'Transport Corporation' and respondents herein are referred to as 'Claimants'.

3. This appeal has been filed by Transport Corporation as against the

award passed by the Tribunal in and by its judgment dated 05.12.2018 passed

in M.C.O.P.No.87 of 2017 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III

Additional District Judge, Vellore, Tirupathur.

4. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

Respondents are children of deceased Sivagnanam. On 24.02.2016 at

about 14.00 hours while the deceased and two others were proceeding in a TVS

Victor Motor Bike bearing Registration No.TN-23-K-5832 on the Vaniyambadi

to Triupattur Main Road, a bus bearing Registration No.TN-23-N-2316

belonging to Transport Corporation came in a rash and negligent manner and

dashed against the two-wheeler of the deceased, as a result of which the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.761 of 2021

deceased sustained grievous injuries. Immediately, the deceased was taken to

Government Hospital, Vaniyambadi. After providing first-aid, the deceased was

taken to TCR Hospital Krishnagiri and then to Nimhans, Bangalore and then

admitted at Brain Spine Hospital, Chennai, where he had taken treatment as

inpatient from 02.03.2016 to 30.05.2016. Again, the deceased was admitted at

Government Hospital, Vaniyambadi, where he died on 31.05.2016. The

deceased was having brick factory and was earning a sum of Rs.35,000/- p.m.

Hence, claimants filed a petition seeking compensation in a sum of

Rs.50,00,000/- for the death of deceased.

5. The said claim was resisted by Transport Corporation by filing a

detailed counter statement interalia contending that the accident had not

occurred in the manner as projected by claimants. They have also denied the

age, occupation and income of the deceased.

6. To prove their claim, on the side of claimants, 3 witnesses were

examined and 15 documents were marked as Exs.P1 to P15. On the side of

Transport Corporation, 1 witness was examined, but no document was marked.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.761 of 2021

7. On appreciation of materials and the entire evidence on record, the

Tribunal arrived at a finding that the accident had occurred due to the rash and

negligent driving of the bus by its driver and the Transport Corporation is liable

to pay compensation. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is as follows:

Sl.No. Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.)

1. Loss of Income 6,48,000/-

                           2.       Future Prospects                               64,800/-
                           3.       Funeral expenses                               15,000/-
                           4.       Love and affection                             40,000/-
                           5.       Medical Bills                               17,66,292/-
                                                              Total         25,34,092/-

The said sum was directed to be paid together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from

the date of claim petition till the date of deposit.

8. The main grievance of learned counsel appearing for Transport

Corporation is that the Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.6,48,000/- as

compensation under the head 'loss of income' and separately awarded a sum of

Rs.64,800/- towards future prospects. The amount awarded under the above

heads is on the higher side since the age of the deceased was 56 at the time of

accident. Thus, learned counsel submits that the amount awarded by the

Tribunal needs appropriate reduction.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.761 of 2021

9. This Court has considered the submission of learned counsel

appearing for Transport Corporation. Perused the materials on record.

10. Since only the quantum of compensation is challenged in the present

appeal, this Court is not dealing with the other aspects of the award.

11. Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, this Court

finds that though it was the case of claimants that the deceased was earning

Rs.35,000/- p.m. by running a brick factory, the Tribunal had fixed a notional

sum of Rs.9,000/- as the monthly income of the deceased on the reasoning that

no document was produced to establish that the deceased was earning a sum of

Rs.35,000/- p.m. As the dependants are two, the Tribunal deducted 1/3rd

towards personal expenses of the deceased, which works out to Rs.6,000/-

(9000 – 3000) and arrived at annual income at Rs.72,000/- (6000 * 12). As the

deceased of was aged 56 at the time of accident, the Tribunal applied multiplier

'9' and arrived at compensation payable under the head 'loss of income' at

Rs.6,48,000/- (72000 * 9). Further, the Tribunal had awarded a sum of

Rs.64,800/- separately under the head 'future prospects'. Looking at any angle,

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the aforesaid heads cannot be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.M.A.No.761 of 2021

said to be on the higher side. Further, this Court finds that the amount awarded

under the other heads is just and reasonable. This Court does not find any

infirmity in the award passed by the Tribunal.

In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed at the

admission stage. The compensation of Rs.25,34,092/- awarded by the Tribunal

is hereby confirmed. Appellant Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the

compensation, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5%

p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of

eight weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. On such deposit being

made by Transport Corporation, claimants/children of the deceased are

permitted to withdraw their respective shares, as apportioned by Tribunal,

along with accrued/proportionate interest and costs, less the amount, if any

already withdrawn by them, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal.

No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                 [R.P.S., J]          [S.S.K., J]
                                                                            10.03.2021
                Index: yes/no
                Internet:yes/no
                gm


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                      C.M.A.No.761 of 2021




                To
                The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                III Additional District Judge,
                Vellore,
                Tirupathur.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                                                      C.M.A.No.761 of 2021



                                                     R.SUBBIAH, J
                                                             and
                                   SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J

                                                                      gm




                                                 C.M.A.No.761 of 2021




                                                            10.03.2021




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter