Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C.K.Raju vs The Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 6352 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6352 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2021

Madras High Court
C.K.Raju vs The Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2021
                                                           1

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 10.03.2021

                                                       CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                   CRL.O.P Nos.34566 of 2019 and 1888 of 2021
                          and Crl.MP.Nos.19161 & 19162 of 2019 and 1076 & 1077 of 2021

                      Crl.OP.No.34566 of 2019:

                      C.K.Raju
                                                                                      ...Petitioner

                                                          Vs.
                      1. The Inspector of Police
                      J-3, Guindy Police Station,
                      Chennai-32
                      Crime No.2596 of 2017

                      2. Yovan
                                                                                 .. Respondents

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in CC.No.2561 of 2019 for the alleged offence under Section 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of IPC on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai filed by the second respondent against the petitioner herein and quash the proceedings.

For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Murugeswari For Respondents : Mr.C.Raghavan R1 Government Advocate

http://www.judis.nic.in

Crl.OP.No.1888 of 2021:

Yovan ...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police J-3, Guindy Police Station, Chennai-32

2. C.K.Raju .. Respondents

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in CC.No.2059 of 2019 for the alleged offence under Section 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of IPC on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai filed by the second respondent against the petitioner herein and quash the proceedings.

                                    For Petitioner            : Mr.M.Ganesan
                                    For Respondents           : Mr.C.Raghavan         R1
                                                               Government Advocate


                                                 COMMON ORDER

The issues involved in both these cases are common and hence,

they are taken up together, heard and disposed of through this common

order.

http://www.judis.nic.in

2. An incident took place on 17.10.2017, resulting in both the

parties having a wordy quarrel and attacking each other. Based on the

complaint given by both the parties, a case and counter was registered in

Crime Nos.2595 & 2596 of 2017. On completion of the investigation,

final report was filed in both the FIRs' for offences under Section 294(b),

324 and 506(i) of IPC.

3. Both the calender cases are challenged before this Court by the

respective parties seeking to quash the proceedings.

4. This Court has carefully considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

5. The main issue that has been raised by the learned counsel

appearing on either side is that the case involves multiple complaints on

the same incident which is registered as a case and counter and the

Investigating Officer must investigate both the cases and find out the real

http://www.judis.nic.in

aggressor and the final report should be filed against such aggressor.

However, in the present case, the respondent police did not take any

efforts to find out the real aggressor and mechanically, final report has

been filed in both the cases for the very same offence. Therefore, it was

argued that the criminal proceedings are liable to be interfered by this

Court. To substantiate this submission, the learned counsel relied upon

the judgment of this Court in [Kumar and others Vs. State by Inspector

of Police, Rasipuram Police Station, Namakkal District and another]

in 2019 4 MLJ Crl 445.

6. In the considered view of this Court, the respondent police has

investigated this case mechanically without taking any efforts to find out

the real aggressor. Surprisingly, final reports have been filed in both the

cases for the very same offence. In view of the same, entire investigation

is vitiated and both the proceedings are liable to the interfered by this

Court. The law on this issue, is well settled and the judgment relied upon

by the learned counsel on either side will squarely apply to the facts of the

present case.

http://www.judis.nic.in

7. In the result, the proceedings in CC.Nos.2561 and 2059 of 2019

on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet are hereby

quashed and both the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed accordingly.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

10.03.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rli

To

1. The Inspector of Police J-3, Guindy Police Station, Chennai-32

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

http://www.judis.nic.in

N.ANAND VENKATESH.J.,

rli

CRL.O.P Nos.34566 of 2019 and 1888 of 2021 and Crl.MP.Nos.19161 & 19162 of 2019 and 1076 & 1077 of 2021

10.03.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter