Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6102 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2021
S.A.(MD)No.136 & 137 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
S.A.(MD)Nos.136 & 137 of 2004
and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.609 & 610 of 2004
and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2008
Santhakumari ... Appellant in
both S.As.
Vs.
1.Thasaiyah
2.Sathiadas
3.Robinson
4.Wilson
5.Nesayyan
6.Davidson
7.Thankappan
8.Nelson
9.Santhakumari
10.Suganthi
11.Freedal
12.Stephen
13.Hepsi
14.Benchamin
15.Sam
16.Jain Rodai
17.Merlin Leyal
18.Christopher Haparaj ... Respondents in
S.A.No.136/2000
1.Sathiadas
2.Robinson
3.Wilson
1/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)No.136 & 137 of 2004
4.Nelson
5.Nesayyan
6.Davidson
7.Thankappan
8.Santhakumari
9.Bright
10.Manokaran Moses
11.Ponnaiyyan
12.Thasaiyyan
13.Suganthi
14.Predal
15.Stephen
16.Hepsibai
17.Benjamin
18.Sam
19.Jeni Rodi
20.Merlin Leekal
21.Mannuel Prakash
22.Doss
23.Alankamani
24.Kasi
25.Selvamony ... Respondents in
S.A.No.136/2000
PRAYER: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code,
against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai
made in A.S.Nos.5 and 6 of 1998 dated 13.03.2003, respectively pursuant to the
judgment and decree dated 05.12.1997 in O.S.Nos.279 & 285 of 1984 on the file
of the II Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai respectively.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Sree Kumaran Nair
(In both S.As)
For Respondents : Mr.K.N.Thampi for R10 to R18
(In both S.As) R7-Died
R2 to R9 Tapal returned.
2/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)No.136 & 137 of 2004
COMMON JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw these Second Appeals and he has filed a memo to that effect.
2. Recording the said memo, these Second Appeals are dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also
dismissed.
08.03.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
vsm
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19
pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official
purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is
the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
concerned.
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai.
2.The II Additional District Munsif,
Kuzhithurai.
3.The Section Officer,
Vernacular Records,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
3/4
http://www.judis.nic.in
S.A.(MD)No.136 & 137 of 2004
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vsm
S.A.(MD)No.136 & 137 of 2004 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.609 & 610 of 2004 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2008
08.03.2021
http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!